INSTITUTE FOR HUMANITIES AND CULTURAL STUDIES Thinking and Children 2383-0700 10 2 2020 02 20 Comparative analysis of rewriting ‘Hayyebne Yaqzan’ written by Kamel Kilani and ‘bacheye adam’ written by Mahdi Azar Yazdi based on Lipmann’s theory Comparative analysis of rewriting ‘Hayyebne Yaqzan’ written by Kamel Kilani and ‘bacheye adam’ written by Mahdi Azar Yazdi based on Lipmann’s theory 47 73 5828 10.30465/fabak.2020.5828 FA Seyyede Zahra Hoseini Talemi Ph.D. candidate of Arabic, Razi university, Kermanshah, Iran Toraj Zinivand . Associate Professor of Arabic Language and Literature Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran Ali Akbar Mohseni Associate Professor of Arabic Language and Literature Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran Yahya Marouf Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran Journal Article 2020 12 04 This article has been written focusing on the comparative analysis of rewriting ‘Hayyebne Yaqzan’ written by Kamel Kilani from Egypt and Mahdi Azar Yazdi from Iran in order to determine how the elements of Lipmann’s theory in these two rewritten works are, while focusing on teaching thoughts in children. The method of this study is descriptive-analytic and has been written on the basis of Matthew Lipmann’s theory. The achievements of this study show that although the focus of rewriting these two stories reflects philosophical thoughts, the methods of them about teaching children’s thoughts has not been on the basis of developing thoughts. However, they can be useful in this program by modifying and creating questions and astonishing the audience. This article has been written focusing on the comparative analysis of rewriting ‘Hayyebne Yaqzan’ written by Kamel Kilani from Egypt and Mahdi Azar Yazdi from Iran in order to determine how the elements of Lipmann’s theory in these two rewritten works are, while focusing on teaching thoughts in children. The method of this study is descriptive-analytic and has been written on the basis of Matthew Lipmann’s theory. The achievements of this study show that although the focus of rewriting these two stories reflects philosophical thoughts, the methods of them about teaching children’s thoughts has not been on the basis of developing thoughts. However, they can be useful in this program by modifying and creating questions and astonishing the audience. http://fabak.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5828_362f0720a92f6bc639697edeb738e001.pdf