Thinking and Children

Thinking and Children

Analysis of the Primary Schools Science Curriculum Based on the Components of Philosophy for Children

Document Type : Scientific- research

Authors
1 M.A. in Curriculum, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Curriculum, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Philosophy of Education, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to analyze elementary school science textbooks through the lens of the components associated with philosophy for children. Employing a descriptive content analysis methodology, the research focused on a statistical population comprising science textbooks spanning grades one through six, with all available textbooks selected as samples for the investigation. The research instrument utilized was a researcher-developed checklist that incorporated various components of philosophy for children, including critical thinking, creative thinking, caring thinking, problem-solving skills, metacognitive awareness in science, scientific exploration, foundational thinking skills, efficient thinking, conversational abilities, encouragement of truth-seeking, engagement with phenomena, and careful observation. The content analysis was performed using both quantitative and qualitative analytical methods. The findings revealed that the components of philosophy for children were referenced 628 times across the examined textbooks. Notably, the highest frequency of references to these components was observed in the sixth grade (148 cases), followed by the fourth grade (132 cases), fifth grade (128 cases), second grade (87 cases), third grade (67 cases), and first grade (66 cases). Furthermore, the most frequently cited components included the exploration component (241 cases), conversational ability (103 cases), and core thinking skills (73 cases). In conclusion, these components were utilized to revise selected excerpts from empirical science textbooks, and a sample of the rewritten text along with its corresponding analysis was presented.
Keywords: Philosophy for children, Curriculum, Experimental sciences, Content analysis, Elementary education.
 
Introduction
Philosophy has long been considered an intellectual activity requiring precise knowledge and complex cognitive skills. When considering philosophy’s relationship with childhood, three main tendencies emerge: the philosophy of childhood, teaching philosophy to children, and children philosophizing themselves. Philosophy for Children (P4C) is a global effort to recognize and encourage children’s philosophical abilities by creating spaces for them to engage in intellectual activities. Unlike typical university philosophy classes, P4C sessions focus on philosophical concepts, questions, and debates rather than mastering historical or contemporary arguments. The P4C approach, introduced by Matthew Lipman in the early 1970s, aims to develop critical thinking in students through guided philosophical conversations in the classroom. This method emphasizes collaboration over competitive debate. Influenced by pragmatists like Charles Sanders Peirce and John Dewey, Lipman believed that scientific inquiry should model the educational process. P4C has shown positive impacts on both students and teachers, enhancing critical thinking, teaching, and perceptions of students. Lipman was motivated to create P4C when he realized his children were not being taught reasoning skills at a young age, which he felt was crucial for their intellectual development.
 
Materials and Methods
The study analyzed elementary science textbooks using the philosophy for children’s components. It employed a descriptive content analysis method with a checklist. The study included all elementary science textbooks from first to sixth grade, analyzing text, questions, exercises, and images. The analysis focused on eleven components: critical thinking, creative thinking, caring thinking, problem-solving skills, metacognitive awareness in science, scientific exploration, foundational thinking skills, efficient thinking, conversational abilities, encouragement of truth-seeking, engagement with phenomena, and careful observation. The textbooks were studied for three months, and the components were counted and recorded in tables for each grade. The frequency and percentage of each component were determined and analyzed. The study used both quantitative and qualitative methods to compare and examine the textbooks. This method allows for a comprehensive comparison of basic science textbooks.
 
Discussion & Result
Teaching the philosophy for children aims to develop reasoning abilities and understanding of philosophy through skills like philosophical, scientific, moral, and social inquiry. This gradual program helps students organize complex thoughts, and enhance reasoning, critical thinking, creativity, and altruism. It focuses on exploring philosophical concepts, recognizing complexity, and appreciating differing views. The main goal is for students to learn to argue, listen, clarify, justify, and explain their thoughts, fostering participation, self-awareness, and decision-making. Education must nurture critical thinking, especially in elementary schools, to prepare students for advanced societies. Despite the recognized importance of philosophy in education, many students lack basic life skills like problem-solving and listening to opposing views. The results showed the attention given to each component in different grades, providing a basis for rewriting text samples. The study highlights the minimal presence of philosophy in elementary science textbooks and emphasizes the need to start philosophical education early to develop creative, responsible adults. The study analyzed the attention to philosophical thinking in elementary science textbooks, finding the highest focus in fourth to sixth grades and the least in first grade. This discrepancy suggests that higher grades, having learned fundamental concepts, show more complex philosophical thinking. The study calls for integrating philosophy into early education to cultivate informed, critical, and thoughtful future generations.
 
Conclusion
In a nutshell, teaching philosophy to children is essential for fostering critical thinking and reasoning skills from an early age. By integrating philosophical inquiry into elementary education, we can help students develop essential life skills such as problem-solving, listening, and understanding diverse perspectives. The findings of the study underscore the need for a more prominent inclusion of philosophical concepts in early curricula, particularly in science textbooks, to ensure that students are equipped with the tools necessary for navigating complex societal challenges. Ultimately, starting philosophical education early will cultivate informed, responsible, and creative individuals who are capable of contributing thoughtfully to their communities
Keywords
Subjects

Anderson, A. (2020). Categories of goals in Philosophy for Children. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(6), 607-623.
Bandelizadeh, Fatemeh; Awazzadeh, Abutaleb; & Forghani, Maryam (2019). Philosophical explanation of creative teaching strategies for elementary school experimental science course with emphasis on philosophy and child curriculum. Philosophy and Child, 6(2), 58-62. [in Persian]
Bleazby, J. (2011). Overcoming relativism and absolutism: Dewey's ideals of truth and meaning in philosophy for children. Educational philosophy and theory43(5), 453-466.
Daniel, M. F., & Auriac, E. (2011). Philosophy, critical thinking and philosophy for children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(5), 415-435.
Dunlop, L. Compton, K. Clarke, L, and Valerie Mckelveyـ Martin. (2015). children inquiry in primary. Science. Education, 3(13), 462ـ 481.
Ebrahimi Tirtash, Fahimeh (2015). Philosophy curriculum for children and its potential in science education. National Conference on Psychology, Social and Cultural Sciences. Tehran. [in Persian]
Figueiredo, F. F. (2022). On the theoretical foundations of the ‘Philosophy for Children’programme. Journal of Philosophy of Education56(2), 210-226.
Fletcher, N. M. (2020). Destabilizing stereotyped concepts in childhood: Some opportunities and risks of philosophy for children as an aid to PVE. Prospects, 48(1-2), 61-78.
Gatley, J. (2020). Philosophy for children and the extrinsic value of academic philosophy. Metaphilosophy51(4), 548-563.
Ghaedi, Yahya (2009). Curriculum for teaching philosophy for children in middle and high school. Farhang, 69, 108-83. [in Persian]
Houshmidi, Fatemeh; Shamshiri, Babak; and Ab Roshan, Hassan (2010). The effect of the philosophy teaching program for children on questioning skills in science lessons (case study: first-grade elementary school students). Educational and School Studies, 9(1), 171-192. [in Persian]
Johansson, V. (2018). Philosophy for children and children for philosophy: Possibilities and problems. International handbook of philosophy of education, 1149-1161.
Kanani Harandi, Setareh; Noorian, Mohammad; Norouzi, Dariush and Abaei Koopai, Mahmoud. (2018). A curriculum model for teaching philosophy to children based on the results of related research. Thinking and Children, 9(2), 121-151. [in Persian]
Lam, C. M. (2023). A philosophy for children approach to professional development of teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education53(1), 1-17.
Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking – what can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38-43.
Lipman, M. (1995). Good Thinking, Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across Disciplines, 15, 37–41.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M. & Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the Classroom (Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press).
Lipman, P. W. (1997). Subsidence of ash-flow calderas: relation to caldera size and magma-chamber geometry. Bulletin of volcanology59, 198-218.
Lone, J. M. (2022). Philosophy for children. A companion to public philosophy, 325-336.
Lyle, S., & Thomas-Williams, J. (2012). Dialogic practice in primary schools: how primary head teachers plan to embed philosophy for children into the whole school. Educational Studies38(1), 1-12.
Marashi, Seyed Mansour; Hashemi, Seyed Jalal and Moghimi Gask, Azam. (2012). Content analysis of the textbooks Let's Read and Write and Gifts of the Sky for the Elementary School Based on Curriculum Criteria (Philosophy for Children). Thinking and Children, 3(1), 69-89. [in Persian]
Murris, K. (2016). The Philosophy for Children curriculum: Resisting ‘teacher proof’texts and the formation of the ideal philosopher child. Studies in philosophy and education35, 63-78.
Vansieleghem, N., & Kennedy, D. (2011). What is philosophy for children, what is philosophy with children—after Matthew Lipman? Journal of Philosophy of Education45(2), 171-182.
Venter, E., & Higgs, L. G. (2014). Philosophy for children in a democratic classroom. Journal of Social Sciences41(1), 11-16.
Yalaki,Y.and  Akkocaoglu,  N. (2017). Philosophy for Children and inquiry- based Science Primary School Students. Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.21ـ25.
Volume 16, Issue 2 - Serial Number 32
Autumn and Winter
February 2026
Pages 179-204

  • Receive Date 06 November 2023
  • Revise Date 21 January 2025
  • Accept Date 26 February 2025
  • Publish Date 21 January 2026