Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching philosophy to children on students' cognitive skills

Document Type : Scientific- research

Authors

1 Master of Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch Marvdasht, Iran,

2 Ph.D. candidate of Educational Psychology, University of Shahid Madani, Tabriz,Iran (

3 Ph.D. candidate of Educational Psychology, University of Shahid Madani, Tabriz, Iran,

Abstract

The purpose of the current research was to Meta-analyze the effectiveness of philosophy education on the cognitive skills of Iranian students. The statistical population was the available research related to cognitive and metacognitive interventions on anxiety, available between 2001 and 2021 in the computer databases accessible. Finally, 72 studies with 89 effect sizes were included in the meta-analysis. The research findings showed that the size of the total combined effect (0.99) is evaluated according to Hattie's criterion and based on Cohen's large criterion. Also, in examining the role of moderating variables, the results of favorable effectiveness on each of the cognitive skills: critical thinking, cognitive flexibility, judgment, problem-solving, and questioning were investigated, among which the effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive flexibility with a summary effect size (1.07) was the highest. Had the amount considering the high effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive skills in gender groups, it is suggested that this program be added to the official education program in schools by following its principles.
Keywords: Effect Size, Cognitive flexibility, Cognitive Skill, Meta-Analysis, Philosophy for Children.
Introduction
The cognitive skills of children are influenced by teaching philosophy. The program of teaching philosophical thinking to children has clear cognitive goals; it engages the mind and does so through challenges, critical thinking, and structural interaction. (Haynes, 2012). Teaching philosophy to children leads to an increase in cognitive skills related to verbal comprehension, spatial relationships, sound combination, concept formation, and visual-auditory memory, which are within the realm of cognitive functions. Preschool children who receive philosophy education have higher cognitive abilities. (Hassan Beigi, 2021) Numerous studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of teaching philosophy to children on the growth of cognitive skills. Each study has examined the impact of teaching philosophy to children on one of the cognitive growth components, such as critical thinking, moral development, problem-solving, creative thinking, questioning spirit, responsibility, etc. Some of the studies in this field include Kabiri et al. (2022) and Soleimanpouromran et al. (2021). Therefore, the breadth and distribution of research conducted in this area highlight the need for a systematic review of previous research. Accordingly, the present meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect size of the combined effectiveness of implementing the philosophy education program on the growth of various cognitive skills.
Materials & methods
In this study, a meta-analysis method was used based on the purpose and nature of the research. In meta-analysis, the findings of primary studies are translated into a quantitative index. The most common method for combining the numerical results of studies in meta-analyses is effect size. The statistical population included all articles published in scientific research journals, master's theses, and valid doctoral dissertations in computerized databases available in the country between 2001 and 2021, which examined the effectiveness of philosophy education on students' cognitive skills using experimental and quasi-experimental methods. Finally, 122 studies were identified, and based on the exit criteria, 50 studies were excluded, and a total of 72 studies with 89 effect sizes were suitable for entry into the meta-analysis based on the scientific and Methodological conditions of the dependent variable dimensions. In the process of searching for primary studies, keywords such as "philosophy education," "philosophy education using the community of inquiry method," "philosophy education for children," and "p4c" were used in computerized databases available in Iran, such as the Scientific Information Database (SID), the National Journal Database, the Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, and the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), as well as foreign information databases such as Google Scholar, Science Direct, and PubMed. In this study, the research design specifications checklist developed by Mesr Abadi (2009) was used to collect information. To analyze the data extracted from primary studies, the effect size of the type g was calculated for each study. CMA version 2 and SPSS version 22 were used for calculating effect sizes and subsequent statistical activities related to combining the results.
Result
Table 1 presents the combined effect size (summary) based on two fixed and random models for 77 primary effect sizes. According to the results, the combined effect size values in the fixed model are 0.95, and in the random model, it is 0.99, and both effect sizes are statistically significant. ) p < 0.001).




Table 1. Combined fixed and random effect sizes related to the effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive skills




Model


Number of effect sizes


Summary  effect size


 
 


95% confidence interval


Z-value


significance level




lower limit


upper limit




fixed


79


0.95


 


0.03


1.02


26/89


0.001




random


79


0.99


 


0.05


1.09


19.26


0.001




 
In Table 2, the effect sizes of the combined effect of teaching philosophy on each of the cognitive skills presented have been provided. The effect sizes of the combined effect of each of the cognitive skills are as follows: 0.97, 0.71, 0.98, 0.81, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively, all of which are significant (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the intragroup Q index is equal to 62.118, of which the intergroup Q index is equal to 37.34 (p < 0.05 and df = 5). The results of this table show that the heterogeneity value between the five groups of primary studies based on cognitive skills is 37.34, and the effect sizes related to the effectiveness of teaching philosophy on cognitive skills can be different and heterogeneous. It should be noted that studies with less than four samples were excluded from this section.




Table 2- Combined effect sizes of the effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive skills




Cognitive skills


Number of effect sizes


Composite effect size


The standard error


95% confidence interval


Z-value


significance level




Lower limit


Upper limit




Critical Thinking


24


0.97


0.06


0.85


1.09


15.52


0.001




Cognitive flexibility


13


1.07


0.09


0.85


1.25


11.80


0.001




judgment


10


0.98


0.11


0.77


1.22


8.95


0.001




Problem-Solving


8


0.81


0.09


0.62


1.01


8.28


0.001




questioning


4


0.95


0.16


0.84


1.27


5.92


0.001




reasoning


4


0.94


0.16


0.62


1.27


5.67


0.001




 
Discussion
To explain the overall effectiveness of teaching philosophy on the growth of cognitive skills, it can be said that philosophy for children is an educational approach that includes various goals, and practicing and implementing it can lead to the growth of cognitive skills. Lipman, as the founder of Philosophy for Children, considers the most important goal of this program to be the cultivation of individuals' reasoning power so that they can think independently and use criteria of correctness in their judgments. In this program, students are encouraged to actively engage with information rather than just accepting it, to analyze and examine the information and knowledge at hand, and to use this skill to equip students with the ability to make sound judgments and choices, as well as critical thinking skills, ultimately preparing them for a suitable role in society. It is expected that by considering the educational and training reasons for this program and focusing on the cultivation of critical and philosophical thinking, teaching philosophy to students in a comprehensive and national program in schools across the country, apart from the official school curriculum, can help improve the education system.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bowman, N. A. (2010). College diversity experiences and cognitive development: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 4–33.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge Academic.
Daniel, M. & Auriac, E. (2011). Philosophy critical thinking and Philosophy for children. Journal of Educating Philosophically, 43, 415-435.
Dawn, J., Flengan, K., Samuel, F. & Vincent, G .(2016). The Achievement Test Desk Reference: A Guide to Learning Disability Identification, Second Edition.
Ellemberg, D., St-Louis-Deschênes, M.(2010). The effect of acute physical exercise on cognitive function during development. Psychol. Sports Exerc, 11, 122–126.
Etesami, H., & Shafiabadi, A. (2023). The Effectiveness of Teaching Philosophy for Children on the Moral Development of Sixth-Sixth School Students in Sixth, Journal of Culture of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 13(52), 233-255. [In Persian]
Evans, J.J. (2003). Basic concepts and principles of neuropsychological assessment. In Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology; Halligan, P.W., Kischka, U., Marshall, J.C., Eds.; University Press: Oxford, UK,; pp. 15–26. 25.
Fathi L, Ahghar., G, Naderi., E. (2018). Teaching Philosophy for Children (P4C) Using a Community of Inquiry Method and its Impact on Students’ Accountability. QJFR 2018; 15 (1):7-18. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26766728.1397.15.1.1.9[In Persian]
Fathi, L., Akhr, Q. & Naderi, E. (2018). The effect of teaching philosophy for children (P4C) collaborative research method on students' responsibility. Family and Research Quarterly, 15(1), 7-18. [In Persian]
Fisher, R. (2007). Teaching children to think. Translated by Safai Moghadam, Massoud and Najarian, Afsaneh. Second edition. Ahvaz: Resesh Publishing. [In Persian]
Fisher, R. (2009). Education and thinking. Translated by Kianzadeh, Forough. Second edition. Ahvaz: Resesh Publishing. [In Persian]
Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2017). Can ‘Philosophy for Children improve primary school attainment? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 5-22.
Hamidi, F., Damavandi, M. E. & Rostami, Y. (2013). Gender Differences in Language Skills among First Grade Students of Primary Schools. Journal of Women in Culture and Art, 5(2), 227-238. [In Persian]
Hassan Beigi, M. (2021). The effect of teaching philosophy to children on cognitive functions in preschool children. Quarterly Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Volume 7, Number 1, 97-82. [In Persian]
Hassan Beigi, M. (2021). The effect of teaching philosophy to children on cognitive functions in preschool children. Quarterly Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Volume 7, Number 1, 97-82. [In Persian]
Haynes, J. (2008). Children as philosophers: Learning through Enquiry and Dialogue in the Primary Classroom London: Routledge Falmer, pages 176.
Haynes, J. (2012). Children as philosophers. London: Routledge Falmer
Haynes, J. (2012). Children as philosophers. London: Routledge Falmer.
Ismaili Kartiji, M. (2013). Teaching philosophy to preschool and elementary school children. Philosophy and Children, No. 5 and 6, 25-44. [In Persian]
Jafari, Z., Samadi, P., & Ghaedi, Y. (2015). The study of the impact of teaching philosophy to children on nurturing their research spirit among preschool students. Research in Curriculum Planning, Volume 12, Number 17, 49-41. [In Persian]
Kabiri, A., Ghasemi, A., & Mazbohi, S. (2022). The Effectiveness of Implementing a Philosophy for Children Program on Perceived Competence and Cognitive Flexibility of Orphaned Boys. Thinking and Children, 12(2), 239-263. doi: 10.30465/fabak.2022.6923 [In Persian]
Kabiri, A., Ghasemi, A., & Mazbohi, S. (2022). The Effectiveness of Implementing a Philosophy for Children Program on Perceived Competence and Cognitive Flexibility of Orphaned Boys. Thinking and Children, 12(2), 239-263. doi: 10.30465/fabak.2022.6923 [In Persian]
Kohan, W. O. (2018). Paulo Freire and Philosophy for Children: A critical dialogue. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37(6), 615-629.
Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (2010). Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press.
Lyle, S. (2021). Philosophy for Children, the UNCRC and Children's Voice in the Context of the Climate
Marashi, S. M. (2009). The dynamics of the research community in the program of teaching philosophy to children, Farhang Quarterly, No. 69, 109-150. [In Persian]
Marashi, S. M. (2009). The dynamics of the research community in the program of teaching philosophy to children, Farhang Quarterly, No. 69, 109-150. [In Persian]
Mcbrayer, K. (2012). Bridging ridging policy-practice gap: protecting right of youth with learning dishabille in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1909-1914.
Padgett, R. D., Johnson, M. P., & Pascarella, E. T. (2012). First-generation undergraduate students and the impacts of the first year of college: Additional evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 53, 243–266.
Petersen, R. C. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J. Intern. Med. 256, 183–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x.
Rezaei, N M., Padarvand, N., Sobhani, A & Rezaei, A M. (2013). Investigating the effect of implementing the philosophy program for children in increasing creativity and components of fluidity, flexibility, initiative and development. Quarterly Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Sciences, 4(2), 19-36. [In Persian]
Roth, Robert & Isquith, Peter & Gioia, Gerard. (2014). Assessment of Executive Functioning Using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). 10.1007/978 - 1 - 4614 -8106 -5_18.
Sabanathan, S., Wills, B., Gladstone, M.(2015).Child development assessment tools in low-income and middle-income countries: how can we use them more appropriately? Archives of Disease in Childhood ,100:482-488.
Seifi Gandomani, M.Y, Shaghagh, F. & Kalantari Meibodi, S .(2018). Efficacy of Philosophy for Children Program (P4C) on self-esteem and problem solving abilities of girls, Journal of Applied Psychology, 5(2), 66-83. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084331.1390.5.3.3.2[In Persian]
Shahmohammadi, N. (2020). A Review of Effectiveness of Teaching Philosophy to Children on Critical Thinking Skills of Sixth-Grade Students. Thinking and Children, 11(1), 95-116. doi: 10.30465/fabak.2020.5831[In Persian]
Smith, A.D. and Kelly, A. (2015). Cognitive Processes. In The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging.  DOI: 10.1002/9781118521373.
Soleimanpouromran, M, & Yasavol, N. (2021). The Effect of P4C (Philosophy for Children) curriculum on children's love of learning and moral judgment. Thinking and Children, 12(1), 57-73. doi: 10.30465/fabak.2021.6365. [In Persian]
Soleimanpouromran, M, & Yasavol, N. (2021). The Effect of P4C (Philosophy for Children) curriculum on children's love of learning and moral judgment. Thinking and Children, 12(1), 57-73. doi: 10.30465/fabak.2021.6365. [In Persian]
Topping, K.J., and Trickey, S. (2014). The role of dialog in philosophy for children, International Journal of Educational Research, 63,69-78.
Williams, S. (2012). A Brief History of P4C and SAPERE. In Lewis, L, and Chandley, N. (Eds), Philosophy for Children through the Secondary Curriculum. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Worley, P. (2016). Philosophy and children. The Philosophers' Magazine, 72, 119-120.
Yan, S., Walters, L. M., Wang, Z., Wang Ch.Ch.(2018).Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Philosophy for Children Programs on Students’ Cognitive Outcomes, Analytic Teaching, and Philosophical Praxis,39(1).33-13.