تفکر وکودک

تفکر وکودک

اثربخشی برنامه درسی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر خودتنظیمی هیجانی و انعطاف‌پذیری روان‌شناختی دانش­آموزان

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه آموزش ابتدایی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 دکتری تخصصی، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد بندرعباس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بندرعباس، ایران
3 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد ارسنجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارسنجان، ایران
4 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه ریاضی و تحقیق در عملیات، واحد گناباد، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران
5 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران
چکیده
هدف‌ این پژوهش‌، تعیین‌ اثربخشی برنامه درسی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر خودتنظیمی هیجانی و انعطاف‌پذیری روان­شناختی دانش­آموزان‌ بود. این‌ پژوهش‌ از نوع‌ مطالعه‌ شبه‌تجربی‌ با طرح‌ پیش‌آزمون‌-پس‌آزمون‌ و گروه‌ کنترل‌ بود. جامعه‌ آماری پژوهش‌ دانش‌آموزانِ‌ دختر ابتدایی‌ شهر شیراز در سال‌ تحصیلی‌ 1401-1400 بود. از این‌ جامعه‌، نمونه‌‌ای به‌ حجم‌ ٣٠ نفر به‌ روش‌ نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای تصادفی‌ انتخاب‌ و به‌ تصادف‌ در دو گروه‌ آزمایش‌ و کنترل‌ جایگزین‌ شدند. ابزار جمع‌‌آوری اطلاعات‌ شامل‌ پرسشنامه سبک‌‌های عاطفی (ASQ)‌ و آزمون‌ دسته‌‌بندی کارت‌های ویسکانسین (WCST)‌ بود. تجزیه‌ و تحلیل‌ داده‌ها با استفاده‌ از تحلیل‌ کوواریانس‌ چندمتغیری در نرم‌افزار (SPSS نسخه 24) انجام‌ شد. تحلیل‌ داده‌‌ها نشان‌ داد که‌ برنامه درسی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان مجنر به‌ تفاوت‌ معنی‌دار بین‌ گروه‌ها در انعطاف‌‌پذیری شناختی‌ و خودتنظیمی‌ هیجانی‌ شده‌ است‌ (٠٥/٠P<). با توجه‌ به‌ یافته‌‌ها، برنامه درسی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان توانسته‌ است‌ به‌ دانش‌‌آموزان‌ این‌ توانایی‌ را بدهد که‌ فرایندهای انعطاف‌‌پذیری شناختی‌ و خودتنظیمی‌ هیجانی‌ خود را بهبود دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Effectiveness of the Philosophy Education Curriculum for Children on Emotional Self-Regulation and Psychological Flexibility of Students

نویسندگان English

Mohammadjavad Farhadipour 1
Mahmood Noori 2
Habibeh Zare, 3
Zeinab Mohammadi 4
Mohammad Kazem Zeraatkar 5
1 M.A. Department of Elementary Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Ph.D. Department of Educational Sciences, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
3 M.A. Department of Educational Sciences, Arsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan, Iran
4 M.A. Department of ElementaryEducation, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
5 Ph.D. Students, Department ofEducational Sciences, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
چکیده English

The purpose of this research was to determine the effectiveness of the philosophy education curriculum for children on emotional self-regulation and psychological flexibility of students. This research was a quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design and a control group. The statistical population of the study was female elementary school students in Shiraz city in the academic year 2021-2022. From this population, a sample of 30 people was selected using a random cluster sampling method and randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. Data collection tools included The Affective Style Questionnaire (ASQ) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Data analysis was performed using multivariate analysis of covariance in software (SPSS version 24). Data analysis showed that the philosophy curriculum for children led to significant differences between groups in psychological flexibility and emotional self-regulation (P<0.05). According to the findings, the philosophy curriculum for children has been able to give students the ability to improve their psychological flexibility and emotional self-regulation processes.
Keywords: Teaching philosophy for children, psychological flexibility, emotional self-regulation, Curriculum, Students
Introduction
The primary school period is considered one of the most sensitive and influential stages of the educational system worldwide, as it plays a fundamental role in the cognitive, emotional, and social development of children. During this period, students are experiencing rapid changes mentally, physically, and emotionally, and face challenges such as increased autonomy, emotional fluctuations, and exposure to new concepts. Therefore, accurately recognizing children's developmental characteristics and responding to their needs is a fundamental necessity for parents, teachers, and the education system. One of the factors that can influence how children develop during this age period is emotional self-regulation. According to theories of emotional development such as Gross's (1998) emotion regulation model, children's ability to manage their emotions plays an important role in their mental health and social adjustment. Emotional self-regulation, as a key component of psychological development, helps children identify, evaluate, and express their emotions in an adaptive manner. Cognitive flexibility is another key component of executive functions that emerges and develops significantly during childhood. This ability refers to the mind's ability to regulate and change cognitive and behavioral actions in response to environmental feedback. Several intervention approaches have been used to improve children's cognitive and emotional functioning, one of the most prominent of which is the philosophy curriculum for children. Students, especially in elementary school, are considered one of the most sensitive and vulnerable groups in society, and their mental health plays a fundamental role in shaping social health and educating the future generation. Meanwhile, two important psychological components, namely emotional self-regulation and cognitive flexibility, are key factors in children's emotional development, social adaptation, and academic success. Lack or weakness in these skills can lead to problems in individual, family, and educational dimensions, including increased anxiety, decreased resilience, academic failure, and disruption in social relationships. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of the philosophy curriculum for children on emotional self-regulation and cognitive flexibility of elementary school students, in order to respond to this scientific gap and pave the way for the development of educational approaches based on the comprehensive development of children.
Materials & Methods
The method of this research was quasi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group. The statistical population of this research consisted of all female elementary school students in Shiraz in the academic year 2021-2022. To determine the sample size of the research, Gall et al. (2012) have proposed a rule according to which, for experimental and quasi-experimental research, 15 people are recommended for each of the experimental and control groups. Therefore, it was predicted that a sample of 30 people (15 people for each group) would be selected from this population using random cluster sampling method and divided into two experimental and control groups. The method of selecting the statistical sample was as follows: First, one school was randomly selected from among the elementary schools in Shiraz city, and 30 students were selected considering the entry and exit criteria and randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. The inclusion criteria for the subjects in this study were: the student's education in the fifth and sixth grades, the satisfaction of school officials and the student's parents, and the student's willingness to participate in the training course. The exclusion criteria were also determined as not completing homework and being absent for more than two sessions during the training.
Discussion & Result
The first finding of the study showed that the philosophy curriculum for children led to an increase in the average scores of participants in the experimental group in cognitive flexibility and its dimensions, including persistence error and total error, compared to the control group. Therefore, it can be argued that the philosophy curriculum for children is effective on cognitive flexibility (error of persistence and total error) in elementary school students. The second finding of the study showed that implementing a philosophy education program for children had a significant effect on emotional self-regulation components and led to a decrease in concealment, an increase in compromise, and an improvement in tolerance in elementary school students.
Conclusion
The present study, like other scientific studies, has limitations that must be considered when interpreting and generalizing the results. These limitations can be classified into two general categories: methodological and scope limitations, and implementation and operational limitations. According to the research results, it is suggested that the philosophy education program be implemented for children in other educational levels and for male students as well to examine the generalizability of the results. Also, the use of clinical tools such as interviews can help to more accurately assess emotional and psychological dimensions. Considering the theoretical foundations related to emotional development and the available empirical evidence, it is suggested that teaching philosophy to children be used as an effective approach in promoting emotional self-regulation and psychological flexibility in elementary schools. This program fosters emotional growth and psychological adjustment in students by strengthening critical thinking, dialogue, and empathy. Its implementation in the form of educational workshops or supplementary curriculum programs can be used by psychologists, counselors, and teachers as a preventive strategy against psychological and behavioral problems.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Teaching philosophy for children
psychological flexibility
emotional self-regulation
Curriculum
Students
جلیلیان، س.، عظیم پور، ا.، و جلیلیان، ف. (1395). اثربخشی برنامه آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر پرورش توانایی حل­مسأله و قضاوت اخلاقی در دانش­آموزان. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های تربیتی، 9(1)، 1-23.
حسنی، م.، بنیسی، پ.، و حقیقی، س. (1398). تبیین افسردگی بر اساس انعطاف‌پذیری روان‌شناختی و احساس انسجام در مادران دارای فرزند مبتلا به اوتیسم. فصلنامه رویش در روان‌شناسی، 8(6)، 103-112.
حسین خانزاده فیروزجاه، ع.، رسولی، ح.، و کوشا، م. (1397). تأثیر بازی‌درمانی بر حافظه کوتاه‌مدت دیداری و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی کودکان مبتلا به اختلال نارسایی-توجه/ فزون‌کنشی. مطالعات روانشناختی، 14(4)، 72-55.
داداشی، س.، احمدی، ع.، و باقنده قراملکی، ح. (1397). نقش انعطاف پذیری شناختی، حافظه کاری دیداری فضایی و تکانشگری در پیش بینی نقص نظریه ذهن در افراد با رگه های اختلال شخصیت مرزی. مطالعات روان‌شناختی، 14 (3)، 24-8.
داودی، ا.، نشاط دوست، ح.، و شریفی، ح. (1390). مقایسه عملکردهای اجرایی در بیماران مبتلا به اسکیزوفرنیا، افسردگی اساسی بدون روان پریشی و افراد بهنجار در شهر تهران. مجله علوم پزشکی اراک، 14(4)، 19-10.
رضایی، ن.، پادروند، ن.، سبحانی، ع.، و رضایی، ع. (1393). بررسی تأثیر اجرای برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان در افزایش خلاقیت و مؤلفه‌های سیالی، انعطاف‌پذیری، ابتکار و بسط. فصلنامه ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 4(2)، 19-36.
زارع، ر.، تکلوی، س.، و غفاری، ع. (۱۴۰۰). اثربخشی بسته آموزش فلسفه به کودکان بر خودتعیین­گری و مسئولیت­پذیری دانش­آموزان ابتدایی. مجله رویش روان­شناسی. ۱۰(۱۲)، ۴۸-۳۸.
شیرزادی، م بیاتی، ش بداقی، آ.، و بابادی عکاشه، ن. (۱۴۰۰). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر هنجارگریزی و درگیری تحصیلی دانش آموزان پسر پایه ششم ابتدایی شهر بروجن. مجله علوم روانشناختی. ۲۰(۹۸)، ۳۰۴- ۲۹۵.
طبری، م.، خالق‌ خواه‌، ع.، مردای، م.، و زاهد بابلان‌، ع.‌ (١٣٩٦). بررسـی‌ تاثیر آموزش‌ «فلسفه‌ و کودک‌» بر روحیه‌ پرسشگری و مهار خشم‌ در دانش‌آموزان‌ پایه‌ چهارم‌ ابتدایی‌ شـهر بابل‌ در سال‌ تحصیلی‌ ٩٥ـ٩٤.  فلسفه‌ و کودک‌. شماره‌ ١٥. ص‌ ١٠٣.
طورانی‌، ز. (١٣٩٦). بررسی‌ تأثیر برنامه‌ی فلسفه‌ برای کودکان‌ بر خشم‌ و قلدری دانش‌آموزان‌ پسر پایه‌ پنجم‌ ابتدایی‌/تهران‌. پایان‌نامه‌ کارشناسی‌ ارشد. دانشگاه‌ الزهرا.
عسگری، م.، دیناروند، .، و ترکاشوند، م. (1394). تأثیر آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر تفکر منطقی دانش آموزان دختر و پسر سوم راهنمایی منطقه ثامن. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، 9(1)، 25-42.
عطارکار، ن.، خلخالی، و.، و امیری مجد، م. (1398). مقایسه کارکرد اجرایی و رضایت تحصیلی در گروهی از کودکان دبستانی با کاهش شنوایی با و بدون کاشت حلزون و کودکان با شنوایی طبیعی. فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی طب توانبخشی، 8(2)،200-209.
فتحی آذر، ا.، تقی پور، ک.، و حاج آقایی خیابانی، آ. (1398). تاثیر برنامه آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر خودتنظیمی هیجانی کودکان کار. تفکر و کودک، 10(2)، 172-151.
کارشکی، ح. (1392). ارزیابی ساختار عاملی مقیاس سبک های عاطفی در دانشجویان. مجله تحقیقات علوم رفتاری، 11(3)، 195-185.
کمالی مطلق، طاهره، و نوشادی، ناصر. (1396). تاثیر آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر سطح پرسشگری دانش‌آموزان دوره ابتدایی. تفکر وکودک، 8(1)، 1-13.
گال، د. م بورگ، و.، و گال، ج. (1391). روش‌های تحقیق کمی و کیفی در علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی (جلد اول)، ترجمه احمد رضا نصر و همکاران. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
محمدی، غ پیرانی، ذ و زنگنه مطلق، ف. (1400). اثربخشی آموزش مبتنی بر فلسفه برای کودکان بر انعطاف‌پذیری روان‌شناختی و عملکرد اجتماعی در کودکان مبتلا به اختلال اضطراب جدایی. مطالعات روان‌شناسی بالینی، 11(44)، 45-71.
محمدی، ف.،کرامتی، ه.، فرزاد، و.، و عرب­زاده، م. (۱۳۹۸). بررسی اثربخشی برنامه آموزش فلسفه به کودکان در پرورش خلاقیت کودکان پیش دبستانی. نشریه تفکر و کودک، ۱۰(۱)، ۲۶۶-۲۳۳.
محمدیان، ب.، و فرقدانی، آ. (۱۳۹۷). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر ارزیابی تعارض بین والدین و خودگردانی تحصیلی. نشریه تفکر و کودک. ۹(۱)، ۷۲-۵۳.
مرعشی، س ، صفایی مقدم، مو خزامی، پ. (1391). بررسی تأثیر اجرای برنامۀ آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان به‌ روش اجتماع پژوهشی، بر رشد قضاوت اخلاقی دانش‌آموزان پایه پنجم ابتدایی شهر اهواز. تفکر وکودک، 1(1)، 83-102.
ناجی، س.، و خطیبی مقدم، س. (1395). تاثیر روش حلقه‌ی کندوکاو فلسفی بر مهارت‌های گفت‌وگویی دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی. تفکر وکودک، 7(1)، 83-110.
نویدیان، ا.، واحدی، ش.، بدری گرگری، ر.، و فتحی آذر، ا. (۱۴۰۰). تاثیر آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر انعطافپذیری روانشناختی دانشآموزان ابتدایی با رویکرد مبتنی بر زمینه فرهنگی. مجله پژوهش‌های کاربردی روانشناختی، ۱۲(۲)، ۲۸۵-۲۶۲.
هدایتی، م و ماه‌زاده، ح. (1395). «فلسفه برای کودکان» و مهارت حل مسئله اجتماعی. علوم تربیتی، 23(1)، 29-54.
 
 
Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2015). School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 711-731.
Bleazby, J. (2009). Reconstruction in Philosophy for Children. Critical and Creative Thinking: The Australasian Journal of Philosophy of Education, November.
Bombaerts, G., & Spahn, A. (2021). Simplify! Using self-determination theory to prioritise the redesign of an ethics and history of technology course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46 (2), 210-226.
Buttelmann, F., Karbach, J. (2017). Development and plasticity of cognitive flexibility in early and middle childhood. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1040, 1-6.
Cam, P. (2014). Philosophy for children, values education and the inquiring society. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(11), 1203-1211.
Cho, E. H., Lee, Deg., Lee, J. H., Bae, B. H., & Jeong, S. M. (2014). Meaning in Life and School Adjustment: Testing theMediating Effects of Problem-focused Coping and Self-acceptance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 777-781.
Claudio, R., & Montse, C. R. (2018). Emotional Self-Regulation in Sport and Performance. In: Oxford University Press.
Colé, P., Duncan, L. G., and Blaye, A. (2014). Cognitive flexibility predicts early reading skills. Front Psychol, 5:565.
Dajani, D. R., & Uddin, L. Q. (2015). Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends in neurosciences, 38(9), 571–578.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
Di Masi, D., & Santi, M. (2016). Learning democratic thinking: a curriculum to philosophy for children as citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(1), 136-150.
Edossa, A. K., Schroeders, U., Weinert, S., Artelt, C. (2018). The development of emotional and behavioral self-regulation and their effects on academic achievement in childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(2), 192-202.
Francis, L. A., Susman, E. J. (2009). Self-regulation and rapid weight gain in children from age 3 to 12 years. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 163(4), 297–302.
Frankel, L. A., Hughes, S. O., O'Connor, T. M., Power, T. G., Fisher, J. O., & Hazen, N. L. (2012). Parental Influences on Children's Self-Regulation of Energy Intake: Insights from Developmental Literature on Emotion Regulation. Journal of Obesity, 2012, 327259.
Gabrys, R. L., Tabri, N., Anisman, H., & Matheson, K. (2018). Cognitive Control and Flexibility in the Context of Stress and Depressive Symptoms: The Cognitive Control and Flexibility Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2219), 1-19.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
Hofmann, S. G., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). The affective style questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(2), 255-263.
Ionescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas Psychol. 30, 190–200.
Jaya, P. J., Antony, R. V., Joseph, J., George, A., & Jacob, G. (2025). Emotional literacy as curriculum: A new paradigm for resilient classrooms. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1610746
Jurado, M. B., & Rosselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding. Neuropsychol. Rev. 17, 213–233.
Lin, C. E. (2013). Cognitive Flexibility. In: Volkmar F.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer, New York, NY.
Lipman, M. (1993). Thinking children and education. USA: Kendal/hunt publishing company.
Lipman, M. (2011). Philosophy for children: Some assumptions and implications. Ethics in Progress, 2 (1), 3-16.
Lipman, M. (2017). The Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children (IAPC) program. In History, Theory and Practice of Philosophy for Children (pp. 3-11). Routledge
MacCormack, J. W. H., Sider, S., Maich, K., & Specht, J. A. (2021). Self-determination and inclusion: The role of Canadian principals in catalysing inclusive-positive practices. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership17(2).
Malboeuf-Hurtubise, C., Léger-Goodes, T., Mageau, G. A., Joussemet, M., Herba, C., Chadi, N., Lefrançois, D., Camden, C., Bussières, È. L., Taylor, G., Éthier, M. A., & Gagnon, M. (2021). Philosophy for children and mindfulness during COVID-19: Results from a randomized cluster trial and impact on mental health in elementary school students. Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry107, 110260.
Manzano-Sánchez, D., Gómez-Mármol, A., Valero-Valenzuela, A., & Jiménez-Parra, J. F. (2021). School climate and responsibility as predictors of antisocial and prosocial behaviors and violence: a study towards self-determination theory. Behavioral Sciences, 11 (3), 36.
Mehdiyev, G., & Yaralı, K. T. (2020). The Effectiveness of Training of Philosophy with Children on Children’s Attitudes toward Human Values. BAYBURT EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ, 15 (29), 251-279.
Mennetrey, C., & Angeard, N. (2018). Cognitive flexibility training in three-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 48, 125-134.
Michaud Dumont, F., Tarabulsy, G. M., Sylvestre, A., & Voisin, J. (2019). Children’s Emotional Self-Regulation in the Context of Adversity and the Association with Academic Functioning. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 50(5), 856-867.
Murris, K. (2016). The Philosophy for Children curriculum: Resisting ‘teacher proof’ texts
and the formation of the ideal philosopher child. Studies in Philosophy and Education,
35(1), 63-78
.
Nia, A. T. (2014). Foster Self-esteem in Adolescents: Lipmann Approach. Journal of Educational and Management Studies, 4(1), 01-05.
Nia, A. T., & Heibati, S. (2014). The Community of Inquiry, an Approach for Enhancing Creativity. Journal of Educational and Management Studies, 4(3), 527-531.
Nilfyr, K., & Ewe, L. P. (2025). Thriving Children’s Emotional Self-Regulation in Preschool: A Systematic Review Discussed from an Interactionist Perspective. Education Sciences15(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020137
Nugraha, D., Husni, F. A. N., Ruhendi, A., & Suhartini, A. (2025). Evaluation the Development of Diversity Students Elementary School. Japdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 1-8.
Nyhus, E., & Barceló, F. (2009). The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the cognitive assessment of prefrontal executive functions: a critical update. Brain and cognition71(3), 437–451.
Orbán, R., Kiss, B. L., Zsidó, A. N., & Pohárnok, M. (2025). Different pathways leading to prosocial behavior in preschoolers: The role of parenting style, child temperament, and self‐regulation. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2025(1), 8836802.
Pankratova, A. A. (2010). The practical, the social and the emotional types of intellect: A comparative analysis. VoPRosy Psikhologii, Issue 2, P. 111. 
Payant, C. (2017). Teaching Philosophy Statements: In‐ Service ESL Teachers’ Practices and Beliefs. TESOL Journal, 8(3), 636-656.
Ramaila, S. M. (2025). Fostering Holistic Development: The Integral Role of Educators in Nurturing Student Growth and Learning. In Former Educators' Roles in Supporting Student Growth and Learning (pp. 117-146). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Ropovik, I. (2014). Do executive functions predict the ability to learn problem-solving principles? Intelligence, 44(1), 64–74.
Roshani, F., Piri, R., Malek, A., Michel, T. M., & Vafaee, M. S. (2019). Comparison of cognitive flexibility, appropriate risk-taking and reaction time in individuals with and without adult ADHD. Psychiatry Research, 112494.
Siddiqui, N., Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2019). Can programmes like Philosophy for Children help schools to look beyond academic attainment? Educational Review, 71(2), 146-165.
Walwanis. M. M., Ponto, S. J. (2019). Clarifying Cognitive Flexibility from a Self-Regulatory Perspective. In: Schmorrow, D., Fidopiastis, C. (eds) Augmented Cognition. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11580. Springer, Cham.
Yan, S., Lynne Masel, W., Wang, Z., & Chia-Chiang, W. (2018). Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Philosophy for Children Programs on Students’ Cognitive Outcomes. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 39(1), 33-13.
Yeniad, N., Malda, M., Mesman, J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., and Pieper, S. (2013). Shifting ability predicts math and reading performance in children: a meta-analytical study. Learn Individ Differ, 23, 1–9.
Zheng, X., Xie, Y., Huang, Y., Tian, X., Xiao, J., & Xiao, W. (2025). Association among cognitive emotion regulation strategies, psychological flexibility and subjective well-being in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional latent profile and mediation analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 33(3), 174.
Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., Roberts, E. D. (2011). Self-regulation and motivation: a review of the literature. Communication presented at Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium, Richmond, VA.

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 26 بهمن 1404

  • تاریخ دریافت 16 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 19 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 26 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 26 بهمن 1404