تفکر وکودک

تفکر وکودک

تاثیر فن شش کلاه تفکر بر مهارت تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان پایه چهارم ابتدایی بر حسب عملکرد تحصیلی

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر به منظور " بررسی اثربخشی فن شش کلاه تفکر بر مهارت تفکرانتقادی دانش‌آموزان پایه چهارم ابتدایی در سه بعد خلاقیت، بلوغ‌شناختی و درگیری ذهنی" اجرا شد؛ ضمنا تاثیر این روش بر تفکر انتقادی سه دسته از دانش‌آموزان (قوی- متوسط- ضعیف) مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. از جامعه دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه چهارم ابتدایی منطقه 15 شهر تهران، یک مدرسه با روش خوشه‌ای انتخاب شد و به طور تصادفی دو کلاس پایه چهارم در گروه‌ آزمایش و گواه قرار گرفتند. روش پژوهشی از نوع شبه‌آزمایشی با پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون بود. برای اندازه‌گیری تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان از پرسشنامه تفکر انتقادی ریتکس (2003) استفاده شد. مداخله آموزشی در قالب تکنیک شش کلاه تفکر در 12 جلسه آموزشی 60 دقیقه‌ای برای گروه آزمایش انجام شد. یافته‌های حاصل از آزمون تحلیل کواریانس چندمتغیری (MANCOVA) نشان داد که فن شش کلاه تفکر بر بهبود تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان در سه بعد خلاقیت، بلوغ‌شناختی و درگیری ذهنی، تاثیر دارند. میزان تاثیر فن شش کلاه تفکر بر مهارت تفکر انتقادی بر اساس عملکرد تحصیلی، در بین دانش­آموزان قوی و متوسط و همچنین دانش­آموزان متوسط و ضعیف تفاوت معناداری وجود ندارد؛ اما بین دانش­آموزان قوی و ضعیف تفاوت معنادار است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of the Six Thinking Hats Technique on the Critical Thinking Skills of fourth grade Elementary Students according to Academic Performance

نویسندگان English

Elham Ramshini 1
Marzieh Dehghani 2
Mehdi Badali 3
1 Master in Curriculum, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate professor of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant professor of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Many studies show that De Bono's Six Thinking Hats training method guides people to improve their critical thinking skills. Therefore, the current research was carried out in order to "investigate the effectiveness of the six thinking hats technique on the critical thinking skills of fourth grade elementary students in the three dimensions of creativity, cognitive maturity and mental engagement"; In addition, the effect of this method on the critical thinking of three categories of students (strong-medium-weak) was investigated. One school was selected from the population of fourth grade elementary school girls in district 15 of Tehran, and two fourth grade classes were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The research method was quasi-experimental with pre-test and post-test. Ricketts (2003) critical thinking questionnaire was used to measure students' critical thinking. Educational intervention in the form of six thinking hats technique was carried out in 12 60-minute training sessions for the experimental group. The results of the multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) test showed that the six thinking hats have an effect on improving students' critical thinking in the three dimensions of creativity, cognitive maturity, and mental engagement. There is no significant difference between strong and average students as well as average and weak students. But there is a significant difference between strong and weak students. In general, it can be said that the technique of six thinking hats improves critical thinking skills in the three dimensions of creativity, cognitive maturity, and mental engagement according to students' academic performance.
Keywords: critical thinking, six hats of thinking, effectiveness, academic performance, fourth grade.
 
 
Introduction
Nowadays, the main goal of primary education is not only teaching reading, writing and the courses defined in the educational system, but teaching how to use thinking skills, including creative and critical thinking, in facing the rapid changes of the modern world, is necessary to cultivate lifelong learners. Critical thinking is a cognitive process that combines the ability to interpret, analyze, and evaluate information, arguments, and experiences with a set of attitudes, skills, and abilities to guide thoughts, beliefs, and actions. Teaching students critical thinking has been developed by teachers around the world in different ways. The six thinking hats concept presented by De Bono (1995) is one example that has inspired a wide range of critical and creative thinking training programs. The Six Thinking Hats technique is an attractive strategy that forces students to think and discuss a problem from different perspectives and includes thinking processes to solve problems, decision-making, and mental processes necessary to benefit from education, such as comparison, evaluation, justification, and inference. The characteristic of each of the thinking hats is as follows: white hat thinking (facts): white hat includes passive issues and forms. With this hat, facts are explored in the form of facts and statistics without any judgment. Red hat thinking (emotions): The red hat emphasizes emotional insights, sudden discoveries, and emotional and non-rational aspects. This hat is a suitable tool for pouring out feelings and emotions. Black hat type thinking (limitations): By wearing this hat, negative but real aspects, limitations, problems, bottlenecks and pessimistic facts related to a phenomenon or issue are expressed. Yellow hat thinking (benefits): With this hat, positive and optimistic but realistic aspects related to a phenomenon are examined. Green hat thinking (creativity): Green hat is used to express new and creative opinions, ideas and solutions. Blue hat type of thinking (management): The blue hat performs the task of managing, controlling and organizing the other five types of thinking. By wearing this hat, a person evaluates and organizes the thoughts of other people. . It seems that the effect of six hats on the critical thinking of students who are different in terms of academic performance (strong, average and weak) has not been investigated so far. Therefore, the main goal of this research is to investigate the effectiveness of the six thinking hats technique on the critical thinking skills of the fourth grade students in the three dimensions of creativity, cognitive maturity, and mental involvement, according to the students' academic performance.
Materials & Methods
The current research is an applied research in terms of its purpose; Also, in terms of method, it is a quantitative research of semi-experimental type with a pre-test and post-test design with an experimental group and a control group. The statistical population of this research includes all fourth grade female students in district 15 of Tehran in the academic year 2022-2023, which includes 25 primary schools, 53 classes and 1550 students. The sampling method in this research is a random cluster. Azadi Primary School, which had 2 fourth grade classes, was selected among the 25 girls' primary schools of the second period of the 15th education district of Tehran. Due to the selection of the real classroom unit as the control and experimental groups, the number of students in the experimental and control groups was 30 and 31, respectively. In order to collect data, Ricketts (2003) critical thinking questionnaire was used. This tool has 33 questions and includes 3 subscales. The intervention was that six thinking hats were taught in the experimental group in 12 one-hour sessions for 3 months. This research was carried out in the second round of the academic year 2022-2023, and in the data analysis, the report cards of the first round were used to divide the students into three categories: weak, medium and strong. It should be noted that in the implementation of the six thinking hats technique, students were not categorized and their division was done only in data analysis.
Discussion & Result
According to the findings, the Six Thinking Hats technique is effective in improving students' critical thinking skills in the three components of creativity, psychology, and mental engagement. There is no significant difference between strong and average students as well as average and weak students (p < 0.05) on the effect of the six thinking hats technique on students' critical thinking skills based on their academic performance. But this difference is significant between strong and weak students (p<0.05).
Conclusion
The six thinking hats technique improves students' critical thinking. By creating an organized structure for discussion, this technique helps students to examine the topic from different angles and express their ideas clearly and reach conclusions.This teaching method is most useful for strong students who have basic critical thinking skills. Strong students can use the Six Thinking Hats technique to explore concepts more deeply and provide more detailed analysis. Weaker students can benefit from it in developing basic critical thinking skills.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

critical thinking
six hats of thinking
effectiveness
academic performance
fourth grade
ابدی، بیژن. (1398). تاثیر آموزش روش شش کلاه تفکر دوبونو در بهبود مهارت شناختی دانشجویان کشاورزی در درس کارآفرینی. نشریه علمی فناوری آموزش، 14(1)، 26-15.
  فتحی‌آذر، اسکندر؛ بدری‌گرگری، رحیم و احراری، غفور. (1393). تاثیر آموزش فن شش کلاه تفکر دوبونو بر گرایش تفکر انتقادی و خلاقیت دانش آموزان. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 4(1)، 188-160.
Abdelkader Elsayed, A. M., & Sabry Abbas, R. E. (2021). The Effectiveness of De Bono's Six Thinking Hats Technique in  the Development of Critical Thinking and Numerical Sense in Mathematics Education in Oman. Ilkogretim Online20(1).
 
Aden, A. A. (2025). What Matters to Academic Performance: A Brief Review of Literature. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 13(02), 3930–3950. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v13i02.el04.
Aithal, P. S., & Kumar, P. M. (2016). Using six thinking hats as a tool for lateral thinking in organizational problem  solving. International Journal of Engineering Research and Modern Education (IJERME)1(2), 225-234.
AKTAMIŞ, H., HİĞDE, E., & ÖZDEN, B. (2016). Effects of the Inquiry-Based Learning Method on Students' Achievement, Science Process Skills and Attitudes towards Science: A Meta-Analysis Science. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 13(4), 170-186.
Alkhateeb, O. (2015). The effects of the six hats based on program in the development of
the pivotal thinking of Islamic concepts students in Hussein university. Journal of
Education and Practice, 6(2),
1-14.
Astakhova, K. V., Korobeev, A. I., Prokhorova, V. V., Kolupaev, A. A., Vorotnoy, M. V., & Kucheryavaya, E. R. (2016). The role of education in economic and social development of the country. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1S).112-123.
Azeez RO. (2016). Six thinking hats and social workers’ innovative competence: An experimental study. Journal of Education andPractice; 7(24): 149-153.
Birigili, B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and creativity, 2(2), 71-80.
Chien, C. W. (2021). A case study of the use of the Six Thinking Hats to enhance the reflective practice of student teachers in Taiwan. Education 3-1349(5), 606-617.
Ekahitanond, V. (2018). Adopting the Six Thinking Hats to Develop Critical Thinking Abilities through LINE. Australian Educational Computing33(1), 1-16.
ElMesawy, W. S., & Allam, A. M. A. E. M. (2016). The Six Thinking Hats and Their Effect on Improving the Skill of Lesson Planning and attitudes of Students in Teaching Practicum within the Faculty of Physical Education for Men. International Journal of Sports Science and Arts, 2(002), 99-133.
Feuerstein, R., Falik, L., & Feuerstein, R. S. (2015). Changing minds and brains—The legacy of Reuven Feuerstein: Higher thinking and cognition through mediated learning. Teachers College Press.
Gill-Simmen, L. (2020). Developing critical thinking skills: Using Edward de Bono’s six thinking hats in formative peer assessment & feedback. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching3(1), 138-141.
Gill-Simmen, L. (2020). Developing critical thinking skills: Using Edward de Bonos six thinking hats in formative peer assessment & feedback. Journal of Applied Learning and Teacher, 3 (1), 138-141.
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks.  Learning, Media and Technology, 34,119 –140.
Gursoy, E & Nur Ozcan, E. (2022). Using six thinking hats to raise intercultural awareness: A pre-experimental study.
Gürsoy, E., & Nur Özcan, E. (2022). Using six thinking hats to raise intercultural awareness: A pre-experimental study.
Hahn, S. (2022). Critical thinking or critical creativity: applying De Bono's six thinking hats to speech-language pathology education and practice.
Hani, U., Petrus, I. & Sitinjak,M.D.(2017). The Effect of Six Thinking Hats and Critical Thinking on Speaking Achievement. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities research,9(2), 85-88.
Hatcher, D. (2016). Richard Paul and the Philosophical Foundations of Critical Thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines31(1), 86-97.
Karmakar, P., & Chattopadhyay, K. N. (2024). Six Thinking Hats: An Educational Technique to Enhance Cognitive Abilities in Education. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(1), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i11247.
Kivunja, C. (2015). Using de Bono’s six thinking hats model to teach critical thinking and problem solving skills essential for success in the 21st century economy. Creative Education6(3), 380-391.
Lagra, J. M. P., Cotongan, S. F. M., & Castillo, A. A. (2024). Six Thinking Hats as Learning Strategy on the Performance in Integrated Science of Grade 7 Students. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 7(1), 25–29. doi:10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i1p103.
Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (2015). Developing scientific literacy skills through interdisciplinary, technology-based global simulations: GlobalEd 2. Curriculum Journal26(2), 268-289.
Litak, А. M. (2015). The application of dr. de Bono’s Six thinking hats method in English teaching practice. НауковізапискиНаціональногоуніверситету “Острозькаакадемія”. Серія «Філологічна», (Вип. 52), 8-10.
Lystopad, O. A., Mardarova, I. K., & Kuk, T. (2017). Forming Students’ Motivation For Creativity By Means of Edward De Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats” Technique.
Oktaviani, L., Aulia, U. Y., Murdiono, M., & Suharno, S. (2024). Strengthening the critical thinking skill through the six‑hat thinking model in Pancasila education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1272–1278. doi:10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21202.
Papakitsos, E. C., Theologis, E., Foulidi, X.,Karakiozis, K., Loulakis, M., & Fotou, K. (2017). Utilizingthe method of De Bono Six Thinking Hats for making educational decisions. Educational Journal of the University of PatrasUNESCO Chair.
Ramírez‐Montoya, M. S., Lugo, J. E., & Valenzuela González, J. R. (2023). Critical thinking in education: Challenges for teacher training and pedagogical implementation. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2202103. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2202103.
Ricketts, J. C. (2003). The Efficacy of Leader ship Development, Critical Thinking Dispositions, and Students Academic Performance on the Critical Thinking Skills of Selected Youth Leaders. Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Sari, I. R., Zainuddin, Z., & Hermawan, H. (2016). The implementation of de Bono’s six thinking hats to improve students’ speaking skill. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.54.
Shohani M, rasoli M, nasrolahi A.(2023). Comparison of teaching methods. Comprehensive research information management system. 2 (1) , 56-82.
Sohi, K. K., & Singh, N. (2023). What It Means to Put Your Thinking Hat on: Six Thinking Hats to Enhance Creativity. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences20(2), 37-45.
Sohi, K. K., & Singh, N. (2023). What It Means to Put Your Thinking Hat on: Six Thinking Hats to Enhance Creativity. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences20(2), 37-45.
Tapinos, E. (2016). “The Limitations Impacting Teachers’ Understanding of Creative Thinking.” Creative Education, 7 (10): 1404–1409.
United Nations. (2024). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Convention recognizing that “primary education shall be compulsory and available free to all”.
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. (2024). Strengthening the critical thinking skill through the six‑hat thinking model in Pancasila education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1272–1278.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wulandari, M. A., Senen, A., Susilawati, Mukarromah, A., Nurdiansah, T. H., & Pratama, D. F. (2024). Critical Thinking Skill: Primary School Teachers’ Knowledge and Its Learning Strategy. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ICTLT 2023), 14–22. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-206-4_3.
Zulkifli, H., & Hashim, R. (2020). Philosophy for children (P4C) in improving critical thinking in a secondary moral education class. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(2), 29-45.
 
 

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 26 بهمن 1404

  • تاریخ دریافت 21 دی 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 09 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 26 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 26 بهمن 1404