اثربخشی آموزش تفکر فلسفی به کودکان بر استرس تحصیلی، خویشتن‌داری و تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان مقطع ششم ابتدایی

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار روانشناسی، دانشگاه اردکان، یزد، ایران.

2 کارشناس ارشد روانشناسی عمومی، دانشگاه اردکان، یزد، ایران

3 استادیار روانشناسی، دانشگاه اردکان، یزد، ایران

10.30465/fabak.2024.9295

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی تأثیر آموزش تفکر فلسفی به کودکان، بر استرس تحصیلی، خویشتن­داری و تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان مقطع ششم ابتدایی انجام شد. پژوهش حاضر نیمه آزمایشی از نوع پیش­آزمون، پس­آزمون با گروه گواه بود. جامعه آماری کلیه دانش‌آموزان پسر مقطع ششم ابتدایی شهر محلات در سال تحصیلی 1398-1399 بودند، نمونه مورد مطالعه 44 نفر بودند که با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و جهت جمع­آوری داده­ها به پرسشنامه­های استرس انتظارات تحصیلی آنگ و هوان (2006)، خودکنترلی فرم کوتاه تانجی، بامیستر و بون (2004) و تفکر انتقادی ساسو (2013) پاسخ دادند. گروه آزمایش به مدت ده جلسه یک ساعته تحت اجرای برنامه آموزش تفکر فلسفی قرار گرفتند. محتوای جلسات آموزشی برگرفته از کتاب بهانه­هایی برای فکر کردن: روشی برای پرورش تفکر فلسفی در کودکان و نوجوانان، اثر محبوبه اسپیدکار (1395) بود. داده ها با استفاده از تحلیل کوواریانس چندمتغیری با نرم افزار  SPSS-22 مورد تجزیه‌ وتحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد سطح معناداری اثر گروه (حذف اثر احتمالی نمره های پیش آزمون) برای متغیر تفکر انتقادی (30/19= Fو00/0=P) و مولفه‌های آن گشودگی انتقادی (21/4= Fو04/0=P) و شکاکیت تأملی (26/8= Fو00/0=P)، خویشتن‌داری (05/20= Fو00/0=P)، و استرس تحصیلی (52/22= Fو00/0=P) و مولفه‌های آن استرس ناشی از انتظارات شخصی ازخود (97/5= F و02/0=P) و استرس ناشی از انتظارات والدین/معلمان (15/3= Fو05/0=P)، از سطح معنی‌داری آلفا (05/0) کوچک­تر می­باشد، می­توان نتیجه گرفت که آموزش تفکر فلسفی به کودکان به ‌عنوان مداخله­ای کارا بر متغیر استرس تحصیلی، خویشتن‌داری و تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان تأثیر دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effectiveness of Teaching philosophical thinking to Children on Academic Stress and Self-Control and Critical Thinking in Sixth Grade Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Azra Mohammadpanah Ardakan 1
  • Azim Shahmansouri 2
  • Shekoufeh Mottaghi 3
  • Fatemeh Saneifar 2
1 Associate Professor of Psychology, Ardakan University. Yazd, Iran
2 . M.A. in General Psychology, Ardakan University, Yazd, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Ardakan University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of teaching philosophical thinking to children on academic stress, self-control and critical thinking of sixth grade students. The current research was a quasi-experimental study of pretest, post-test with control group. The statistical population of this study was all sixth grade elementary school boy students in Mahallat in the academic year 2019-2020. The study sample consisted of 44 people who were selected by convenience sampling method and responded to the questionnaires of Ang and Huan (2006) Academic Expectation Stress Questionnaire (AESI), Tanji and Boomister (2004) Short Form Self-Control Questionnaire and Saso Critical Thinking Questionnaire (2013). The experimental group was subjected to the implementation of the philosophical thinking training program for ten one-hour sessions (one session per week) before the start of the classroom in Seyedabadi Elementary School of Mahalat city by the researcher. The content of the training sessions was taken from the book "Excuses for Thinking: A Method for Developing Philosophical Thinking in Children and Adolescents" by Mehbooba Speedkar (2015).​ The collected data was analyzed using multivariate covariance analysis and SPSS-22 software. The results showed that the significant level of the group effect (removing the possible effect of pre-test scores) for the critical thinking variable (F=19.30 and P=0.00) and its components critical openness (F=4.21 and P=0.04) and Reflective skepticism (F=8.26, P=0.00), self-control (F=20.05, P=0.00), and academic stress (F=22.52, P=0.00) and its components, stress caused by personal expectations of oneself. (F=5.97 and P=0.02) and the stress caused by parents/teachers' expectations (F=3.15 and P=0.05), is smaller than the alpha significance level equal to 0.05 can be concluded that teaching philosophical thinking to children as an effective intervention has an effect on the variable of academic stress, self-control and critical thinking of students.
Keywords: teaching philosophical thinking for Children, Academic Stress, Self-Control, Critical Thinking
Introduction: Human's natural environment is such that he should adapt himself to it. The surrounding environment can reveal some psychological variables in humans, on the other hand, by training skills, people can become aware of the psychological variables in their existence and use them well in situations and solve many challenges on their way. Today, various ways and methods have been invented to teach people, each of which has special characteristics. One of the new educational methods that has been welcomed by education professionals in recent years is the method of teaching philosophy to children. This new approach teaches children how to think. The program for teaching philosophy to children has clear goals; making the mind to activate and function is one of these goals; This work is done by challenging the obvious, learning principled thinking and structural interaction and acting on them. In the field of education, increasing children's epistemological understanding by teaching them philosophy can affect the individual's performance in academic fields. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of teaching philosophical thinking to children on academic stress, self-control and critical thinking of sixth grade students.
Materials and methods: This research is specific and objective in terms of its practical purpose and results and has a practical aspect. The current research was a semi-experimental type of pre-test, post-test with a control group. The statistical population was all the male students of the sixth grade of Mahalat city in the academic year of 2018-2019. The sample was 44 people who were selected by available sampling method and to collect data, Ang and Hwan's academic expectations stress questionnaires were used. (2006), Tanji, Baumeister, and Boone's (2004) short form self-control and Sasso's (2013) critical thinking answer. The experimental group underwent the philosophical thinking training program for ten one-hour sessions. The content of the training sessions was taken from the book "Excuses for Thinking: A Method for Developing Philosophical Thinking in Children and Adolescents" by Mehbooba Speedkar (2015). In each session, the intellectual stories of Philip Kam, translated by Shahr Tash and Rashtchi were used. The themes of the stories included anger, aggression, friendship and respect, which made students question. The introductory session was dedicated to introducing the program and explaining the objectives of the program, then exercises were presented to familiarize the students with the method of implementing the program. During the sessions, parts of the stories were read by one of the students, and then they were asked to write down their questions about the stories so that at the end of the story, they could talk about the questions by presenting reasons. In this way, a discussion was formed that made it possible to reach the research community. After the end of the sessions, the final tests were performed for both groups and the difference in the collected scores was analyzed using multivariate covariance analysis with SPSS-22 software.
Discussion: Before running the covariance analysis, the assumptions of the statistical method were checked. The findings showed that the significance level of the variables of critical thinking, self-control and academic anxiety is more than 0.05, so it can be concluded that the variance of the samples is homogeneous. Also, the scores of the groups in critical thinking, self-control and academic anxiety have a normal distribution; and the homogeneity of the regression slope was confirmed. Next, the results of covariance analysis showed the significant level of the group effect (removing the possible effect of pre-test scores) for the variable of critical thinking (F=19.30 and P=0.00) and its components critical openness (F=4.21 and P=0.04). P) and reflective skepticism (F=8.26, P=0.00), self-control (F=20.05, P=0.00), and academic stress (F=22.52, P=0.00) and its components stress caused by Personal expectations from oneself (F=5.97 and P=0.02) and stress caused by parents/teachers' expectations (F=3.15 and P=0.05) are smaller than the significant alpha level (0.05). .
Results: Finally, teaching philosophy to the students in this research made them identify the inconsistency in the discussion and make logical conclusions by recognizing the harmony between the two sentences, the spirit of criticism and criticism was created in them so that they can to judge, criticize and evaluate others and finally go to self-correction by making better decisions or choices in self-criticism; Therefore, according to the results, this study shows that the implementation of the philosophy program for children has significant effects on the development of critical thinking, curiosity and questioning, self-control and preventing children's academic anxiety. According to the results obtained from this research and the positive effects of the philosophy program for students on questioning and critical thinking, self-control and preventing children's anxiety, it seems that this program can improve the structure of the educational system that aims to foster Questioning and critical thinking people have a positive effect. In other words, teaching philosophical thinking to children as an effective intervention has an effect on the variables of academic stress, self-control and critical thinking of students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • teaching philosophical thinking for Children
  • Academic Stress
  • Self-Control
  • Critical Thinking
الماسی حسینی، صمد. (1391). تأثیر اجرای برنامه آموزش تفکر، با عنوان فلسفه برای کودکان به‌صورت اجتماع پژوهشی، بر بهبود مهارت‌های اجتماعی و عزت‌نفس در دانش‌آموزان پایه پنجم دبستان‌های پسرانه و دخترانه آموزش‌وپرورش شهرستان دورود. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی،.
تجلی نیا، امیر؛ کریمی، روح‌الله. (1393). بررسی تأثیر اجرای برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان در کاهش و مهار خشم دانش‌آموزان پسر پایه اول مقطع متوسطه شهر کرمان، مجله تفکر و کودک، علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 5 (1)؛ 39-63.
حسینائی، علی؛ نعمتی، زهرا. (1399). رابطه خودکنترلی و ادراک شایستگی با اضطراب امتحان در دانش‌آموزان مقطع ابتدایی شهرستان بیارجمند، دهمین کنفرانس ملی روانشناسی، علوم تربیتی و اجتماعی؛1-9.
خیری، طاهر. (1382). خودکنترلی در سازمان، فصلنامه تدبیر ، شماره 137.
دره زرشکی، نسرین؛ برزگر بفرویی، کاظم و زندوانیان، احمد. (1396). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه به شیوه حلقۀ کندوکاو بر تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی یزد، فصلنامه روانشناسی شناختی، 5(2)؛ 1 -11.
راستی، مریم؛ گرائیلی، الهه؛ احمدی، گلمهر؛ پورشریعه، طالب­علی؛ عباسی، رضوانه. (2017). مقایسه دشواری تنظیم هیجان و خودکنترلی در دانش‌آموزان دارای اضطراب بالا و پایین آزمون. کنفراس بین‌المللی دانشگاه شیراز.
سیفی گندمانی، محمد یاسین؛ شقاقی، فرهاد؛ کلانتری میبدی، سارا. (1390). اثربخشی برنامه آموزش فلسفه به دانش‌آموزان دختر بر عزت‌نفس و توانایی حل مسئله آن‌ها، نشریه روانشناسی کاربردی، 5، (2)؛ 66-83.
شریفی راد، غلامرضا؛ محبی، سیامک؛ مطلبی، محمد؛ شاه سیاه، مرضیه؛ تبرایی، یاسر. (1390)، تأثیر آموزش قاطعیت بر میزان اضطراب تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی سبزوار. 18(2)؛ 82-90.
صفری دهخوارقانی، نسرین. (1392). مقایسه اثربخشی شیوه کنترل تکانه پارکینسون و آموزش خودکنترلی بر کاهش تکان شوری نوجوانان دختر شهر تهران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، روانشناسی عمومی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
عیسی مراد، ابوالقاسم؛ نفر، زهرا؛ فاطمی، فاطمه السادات. (1398). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه به کودکان بر همدلی و حل مسئله اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان پنجم ابتدایی. فصلنامه مطالعات روانشناسی بالینی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، 9 (36)؛ 117-134.
عبدالله پور بنه خلخال، رؤیا؛ مقدس جعفری، محمدتقی؛ کرمی پور شمس‌آبادی، محمدرضا. (1390). بررسی تأثیر آموزش فلسفه بر ارتقای مهارت‌های پرسشگری و تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه پنجم ناحیه دو قزوین، فصلنامه آموزش- پژوهشی- تحلیلی کودک و فلسفه. 1 (2)؛ 37-48.
قبادیان، مسلم. (1397). تأثیر برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان بر رفتار مدنی- تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان پسر پایه نهم متوسطه اول ناحیه یک شهر خرم‌آباد. پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی انسانی، (2)9؛ 31-52.
کوشکی، محمود؛ کرامتی، هادی؛ حسنی، جعفر. (1397). اثربخشی آموزش خودکارآمدی بر استرس تحصیلی و مهارت‌های اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان دختر، مجله روانشناسی مدرسه، 7 (2)؛ 196-213.
محمدیان، بنت الهدا و فرقدانی، آزاده. (1397). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر ارزیابی تعارض بین والدین و خودگردانی تحصیلی. دو فصلنامه تفکر و کودک. 9 (1)؛ 53-72.
مرعشی، منصور؛ حقیقی، جمال؛ بنابی مبارکی، زهرا و باشلیده، کیومرث. (1386). بررسی تأثیر روش اجتماع پژوهشی بر پرورش مهارت‌های استدلال در دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه سوم. فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی، 2(7)؛ 95-122.
ناجی، سعید. (1389). کندوکاو فلسفی برای کودکان و نوجوانان، جلد اول، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
هاشمی، سمیه. (۱۳۹۱). بررسی تأثیر اجرای برنامه آموزش فلسفه به کودکان به روش اجتماع پژوهشی بر خلاقیت و آگاهی فراشناختی دانش آموزان پایه ششم ابتدایی ناحیه ۱ شهر همدان. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز همدان.
 
Barrow., W. (2015). I think shes learnt how to sort of let the class speak: Childrens perspectives on philosophy for children as participatory pedagogy. Thinking Skills and Creativity.17; 76-87.
Crawford,. A.M, Manassis., K. (2001). Familial predictors of treatment outcome in childhood anxiety disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(10); 1182-9
Cassidy., C. Marwick., H, Deeney., L, Mclean., G. (2017). Philosophy with children, selfregulation and engaged participation for children with emotional-behavioural and social communication needs. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 2-16.
Cagla., G. (2011). Philosophy in the early Years: In international conference on education and education psychology (iceepsy 2010) Philosophy in the early years. Social and Behavioral Sciences, (12); 501-511.
Daniel., F.M. & Auriac., E. (2011). Philosophy, critical thinking and philosophy for children. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 43(5); 415-435.
Daniel., m A. Schlefer., m. & le bouis., p. (1992). Philosophy for children the continuation of deweyes democratic project. Analytic teaching. 13(1); 3-12.
Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching Children to Think (2th). London. Nelson Thornes
Friese., M. & Hofmann., W. (2009). Control Me or I Will Control You: Impulses, Trait self-control, and the Guidance of Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality. 43 (5); 795-805.
Gimenez., M. Quintanilla., L. Ojeda., V, Lucas – Molina., b. (2017). Effect of dialoguebased program to improve emotion knowledge in spanish roma preschoolers. Infants & Young children. 30(1); 3-16.
Hamidi., F. Otoufati Roudi., M. (2021). MSc Design and Effectiveness of Philosophizing on Cognitive Flexibility and Proactive Inhibition of Preschool Children. Health Education and Health Promotion. 2021; 9 (1); 1-10.
Khosravi., M, Bigdely., I. (2008). The relationship between personality factors and test anxiety among university students. J Behav Sci. 2008;1(2); 13-24. Persian.
Keogh., E, Bond., FW, Flaxman., PE. (2006). Improving academic performance and mental health through a stress management intervention: outcomes and mediators of change. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(3):339-57.
Kristian., s, Nielsen., a, Jan., M, Bauer., b, Wilhelm., H. (2019). Examining the relationship between trait self-control and strees: Evidence on generalizability and outcome variability, Journal of Research in Personality. 84 (2020) 103901; 2-7.
Kan., j. (1984). Education and the search for coherence. Teacher college record, 85(4). 676-683.
Kessle.r, R.C., Aguilar –Gaxiola., S., Alonso., j, Gatterji, S., Lee., S, Ormel., j. .Ustun., T.B. et al. (2009). the global burden of mental disorders: an update from the WHO world mental health (WMH) surveys.epidemiology and psychiatric sciences. 18; 23-33.
Lashkari Pour., K, Bakhshani., NM, Solaimani., MJ. (2007). The relationship between test anxiety and academic achievement in students of guidance schools in Zahedan. J Zahedan Univ Med Sci. 4(8); 253-259.
Madhuri., H & Saini., A. (2017). Academic Anxiety: An Overview. Educational Quest: An Int. J. of Education and Applied Social Science. 8(3); 807-810. DOI: 10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00139.8
Masi., D. & Santi., M. (2016). Learning democratic thinking: a curriculum to philosophy for children as citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 1 (48); 136-150 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1088064.
Mayer., J. D, Salovay., P. (2003). Measuring emotional with the MSCEIT V. 2.0. Emotion, 3; 97-105.
Mehta., S. & Whitebeard., D. (2005). Philosophy for children and moral development in the India context: Cambridge University, 21; 2-21.
Mardazad Behi., E, Yarigholi., B, Piri., M. (2020). The Effectiveness of Teaching Philosophy to Children through the Community of Inquiry Approach on Students’ Academic Anxiety. Thinking and Children, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) Biannual Journal, 11 (2); 231-255 Doi: 10.30465/FABAK.2021.5961.
Reznitskaya., A. (2008). Philosophical Discussions in Elementary School Classrooms: Theory, Pedagogy, Research. Montclair State. University, New Jersey, USA.
 Romano., L, Tang., X., Hietajärvi., L, Salmela-Aro., K., Fiorilli.,  C. (2020). Students' Trait Emotional Intelligence and Perceived Teacher Emotional Support in Preventing Burnout: The Moderating Role of Academic Anxiety. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2. 17 (13); 4771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134771.
Tage., S. Rai., (2019). Higher self-control predicts engagement in undesirable moralistic.
Worley., P. (2016). Philosophy and children. The Philosophers' Magazine, 72; 119-120.
Zhang., j. (2020). "A longitudinal Study of Pekrun's Control-Value Theory and the Internal/External Frame of Reference Model in Predicting Academic Anxiety". Educational Psychology.6, (2); 21-28.