اثربخشی برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان بر تاب‌آوری و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان پسر محروم از پدر

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه آموزش علوم‌تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889- 14665 تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه آموزش علوم‌تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889- 14665 تهران، ایران،

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی میزان اثربخشی برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان بر تاب‌آوری و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان پسر محروم از پدر بود. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ شیوه گردآوری داده‌ها کمی بود که با روش شبه آزمایشی و طرح گروه گواه نامعادل انجام شد. جامعه پژوهش کلیه‌ دانش‌آموزان پسر محروم از پدر دوره دوم ابتدایی شهر کرج در سال تحصیلی 1402- 1401 بودند که با روش نمونه­گیری در دسترس تعداد 30 دانش­آموز انتخاب و با انتصاب تصادفی ساده با کمک قرعه‌کشی در دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل (هر گروه 15 نفر) جای داده شدند. پیش از مداخله، تاب­آوری دانش­آموزان به وسیله پرسشنامه کانر و دیویدسون (2003) و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی آن­ها نیز به وسیله پرسشنامه مورگان و جینکز (1999) اندازه­گیری شد. سپس گروه آزمایش به مدت ده جلسه دو ساعتی برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان را دریافت و در پایان پس­آزمون برای هر دو گروه اجرا شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها با بهره‌گیری از آزمون تحلیل کواریانس تک‌متغیری و چندمتغیری انجام شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد؛ برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان بر افزایش تاب­آوری و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی موثر بوده است. در نتیجه از این‌ برنامه می‌توان به عنوان راهکاری مناسب برای ارتقای تاب‌آوری و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان محروم از پدر استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effectiveness of the philosophy program for children on the resilience and academic self-efficacy of male students deprived of having a father

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Moradi 1
  • Mohsen Kordlo 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of the philosophy program for children on the resilience and academic self-efficacy of male students deprived of having a father. This research was applied in terms of purpose and quantitative in terms of data collection method, which was carried out with a quasi-experimental method and nonequivalent control-group design. The research population of the research included all students of the second period of elementary school in Karaj city in the academic year of 1401-1402, which 30 male students deprived of having a father were selected as a sample with using the available sampling method and were assigned to two experimental and control groups by a simple random method with lottery (each group 15 people). Before the intervention, students' resilience was measured by the Connor and Davidson questionnaire (2003) and their academic self-efficacy was also measured by the Morgan and Jinks questionnaire (1999). Then, the experimental group received the philosophy program for children for ten sessions of two hours and at the end, the post-test was conducted for both groups. Data analysis was done using univariate and multivariate analysis of covariance test. The research findings showed; philosophy program for children significantly increased the resilience and academic self-efficacy of male students deprived of having a father. As a result, this program can be used as a suitable solution to improve the resilience and academic self-efficacy of students deprived of having a father.
Keywords: Resilience, Academic Self-efficacy, Philosophy for Children, Male Students Deprived of Having a Father, Philosophical Exploration Circle.
 
Introduction
Deprivation of a father can create difficulties, responsibilities and challenges for male students aged 9 to 12 years, which are inevitable to deal with in order to maintain health, adaptation and continued growth. Resilience is an acquired construct defined as a person's ability to return or transition from hardships. Another possible negative consequence of father deprivation on male students can be the occurrence of academic problems and low academic self-efficacy. Philosophy for children as a practical program to develop judgment and moral, critical and creative thinking is able to help male students deprived of having a father to become empowered in solving their personal and social problems.
 
Materials and methods
The present research is among the quantitative researches in terms of practical purpose and in terms of data collection method, which was carried out using a quasi-experimental method based on a nonequivalent control- group design. The implementation steps of this project include the random replacement of research subjects in experimental and control groups, performing the pre-test in both groups, performing the philosophy program for children only in the experimental group, and at the end of the post-test in both groups. The statistical population of the research included all the students deprived of a father (due to death, divorce and leaving the family) in the second period of elementary school in Karaj city. Using available sampling method, 30 male students deprived of having a father were selected from the primary schools of education in the fourth district and divided into two experimental and control groups (15 people in each group) by Simple random appointment with the help of a lottery. Data collection tools include Connor- Davidson (2003) resilience questionnaire and Morgan & Jinks (1999) academic self-efficacy questionnaire.
 
Discussion & Result
The research findings show; The level of resilience for the control group in the pre-test stage has an average of 14.85 and in the post-test stage it has an average of 14.99. In the experimental group, in the pre-test stage, it has an average of 14.22 and in the post-test stage, it has an average of 17.46. Therefore, the average post-test resilience scores have been increasing compared to the pre-exam average in the experimental group, which indicates the impact of the implementation of the philosophy program for children on the resilience of male students deprived of having a father. Regarding the components of resilience, the findings of the research show that the implementation of philosophy for children has a positive and significant effect on the level of individual competence and tenacity, trust in the instincts of bearing negative emotions, acceptance of positive change and secure relationships, degree of control and spirituality of father-deprived elementary school students.
      Another finding of the research shows that academic self-efficacy in the control group has an average of 9.83 in the pre-test stage and 9.88 in the post-test stage. In the experimental group, this average is 9.62 in the pre-test stage and 12.53 in the post-test stage. The above data shows an increase in the average scores of academic self-efficacy in the students of the experimental group in the post-test stage compared to the pre-test stage, which shows the effectiveness of the implementation of the philosophy program for children. Regarding the components of academic self-efficacy, the findings of the research show that the implementation of the philosophy program for children has a positive and significant effect on the level of talent, effort and context of father-deprived students in elementary school.
 
Conclusion
The research results showed; The implementation of the philosophy program for children has an effect on the resilience and academic self-efficacy of male students deprived of having a father in elementary school. In explaining the above result, it can be said; The implementation of the philosophy program for children by changing the teacher-centered environment of the classroom to a collaborative and dialogue-based environment based on philosophical exploration, by cultivating the students' thinking skills, has prepared them to be successful in facing real life issues and problems by promoting resilience and in academic and school matters, while identifying and discovering their talent, they will achieve self-efficacy in education by increasing efforts.
      Other research results show; the implementation of the philosophy program for children has a positive and significant effect on the resilience components of father-deprived students in elementary school. In explaining the above result, it can be said; philosophical exploration circles strengthen students' mental imagery and cognitive and metacognitive skills by telling philosophical and informative stories. Then, through discussions about the concepts and topics of each story and relating it to the real issues in the society, it makes the students identify with the main character of the story who faces obstacles to achieve her desires and be forced to search for possible solutions to solve the obstacles to fulfill their wishes through collaborative collective thinking. Another result of the research shows the significant positive effect of implementing the philosophy program for children on the components of academic self-efficacy of male students deprived of having a father in elementary school. In the end, it can be concluded that the implementation of the philosophy program for children has a positive and significant effect on the resilience and academic self-efficacy of male students deprived of having a father in elementary school.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Resilience
  • Academic Self-efficacy
  • Philosophy for Children
  • Male Students Deprived of Having a Father
  • Philosophical Exploration Circle
الماسی‌حسینی، سیدصمد (1391). بررسی تأثیر آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر رشد مهارت‌های اجتماعی و عزت‌نفس دانش‌آموزان پایه پنجم. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی، گروه آموزش ابتدایی.
بشارت، محمدعلی؛ صالحی، مریم؛ شاه‌محمدی، خدیجه؛ نادعلی، حسین؛ زبردست، عذرا (1387). رابطه تاب‌آوری و سخت‌کوشی با موفقیت ورزشی و سلامت روانی در ورزشکاران. فصلنامه روانشناسی معاصر، دوره 3، شماره 2، پیاپی 6، صص 38 -49.
حسینی، زهره (1389). فلسفه و کودکان. خردنامه‌ صدرا، ویژه‌نامه‌ دهمین سالگرد انتشار، صص 93- 100.
جمالی، مکیه؛ نوروزی، آزیتا؛ طهماسبی، رحیم (1392). عوامل مؤثر بر خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و ارتباط آن با موفقیت تحصیلی در دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر سال 93- 1392. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 13 (8)، صص 629- 641.
خوشنوای فومنی، فاطمه (1395). تبیین پیامدهای فلسفه‌ورزی بر تاب‌آوری نوجوانان مورد غفلت واقع‌شده: مطالعه‌ای ترکیبی. رساله دوره دکتری، دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده پرستاری، گروه پرستاری.
راهدار، انسیه ( 1396). تأثیر آموزش فلسفه به کودکان در خودکارآمدی، خوش‌بینی، شادی و تفکر انتقادی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان.
رحیمی، سلام؛ واحدی، شهرام؛ ایمانزاده، علی. (1398). تأثیر آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر تاب‌آوری دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی. دوفصلنامه تفکر و کودک، سال 10، شماره 2، پاییز و زمستان، صص 47- 67.
سامانی، سیامک؛ جوکار، بهرا؛ صحراگرد، نرگس (1386). تاب‌آوری، سلامت روانی و رضایتمندی از زندگی. مجله روانپزشکی و روانشناسی بالینی ایران، (3) 13، صص 290- 295.
سلیمان‌پور عمران، محبوبه؛ یساول، ناهید (1400). تأثیر برنامه درسی فلسفه برای کودکان بر عشق به یادگیری و قضاوت اخلاقی کودکان. دوفصلنامه علمی تفکر و کودک. سال 12، شماره 1، صص 59- 73.
شولتز، دوان. پی (1401). نظریه‌های شخصیت. ترجمه یحیی سیدمحمدی. تهران: انتشارات ویرایش
عفتی کلاته، مریم؛ بهرنگی، محمدرضا؛ منفردی راز، براتعلی (1397). تأثیرپذیری رشد مهارت‌های زبانی دانش‌آموزان دوزبانه از مراحل الگوی مدیریت آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان با محوریت اجتماع پژوهشی. فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، ۳۴ (۳)، صص ۱۴۲-۱۲۱.
فیشر، رابرت (1392). داستان‌هایی برای فکر کردن. ترجمه سیدجلیل شاهری‌لنگرودی. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
کم، فیلیپ (1397). داستان‌های فکری 2: کندوکاو فلسفی برای کودکان. ترجمه‌ مژگان رشتچی و فرزانه شهرتاش. تهران: انتشارات شهرتاش.
کبیری، علی‌اکبر؛ قاسمی، علی؛ مذبوحی، سعید (1400). اثربخشی اجرای برنامۀ فلسفه برای کودکان بر ادراک شایستگی و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی کودکان پسر بی‌سرپرست. دوفصلنامه تفکر و کودک، سال 12، شماره 2، پاییز و زمستان، صص 241- 163.
گال، مردیت؛ بورگ، والتر؛ گال، جویس (1401). روش‌های تحقیق کمی و کیفی در علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی. جلد دوم. ترجمه احمدرضا نصر (و همکاران). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
لهراسبی، زینب (1394). اثربخشی راه­کارهای تاب­آوری بر سلامت روان و عزت­نفس کودکان کار. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، دانشکده روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی.
ملکیان خورشیدآبادی، زهرا (1400). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر تفکر انتقادی و خودکارآمدی تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته تاریخ و فلسفه آموزش و پرورش، تعلیم و تربیت اسلامی. دانشگاه پیام‌نور، واحد خوی، استاد راهنما: محمدباقر اکبرپور.
موسوی‌موید، مینا سادات (1398). اثربخشی آموزش مهارت‌های تصمیم‌گیری و خودآگاهی به شیوه فلسفه برای کودکان بر امید به زندگی و تاب‌آوری کودکان کار. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد در رشته مشاوره، گرایش خانواده، دانشگاه غیرانتفاعی رفاه، استاد راهنما: مریم دیبا واجاری.
هاشمی، سهیلا؛ اکبری، عباس؛ عباسی‌اصل، رویا؛ اردشیری‌آلاشتی، رویا (1397). ساختار عاملی و کفایت روانسجی فرم کوتاه مقیاس تاب‌آوری (RS-14). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های نوین روانشناختی. سال 13، شماره 51، پاییز، صص 251- 272.
هدایتی، مهرنوش؛ رضایی، محمدهاشم؛ پیرانی، ذبیح؛ هاشمی، مسعود (1395). تأثیر اجرای برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان بر نگرش ارزشی دانش­آموزان پسر پایه هفتم دبیرستان­ شهر خرم­آباد. دوفصلنامه علمی تفکر و کودک، 7 (2)، صص 79- 104.
   
Abram, M. Jacobowitz, W. (2021). Resilience and burnout in healthcare students and inpatient psychiatric nurses: A between-groups study of two populations. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing; 35: 1-8.
Accorinti, Stella. (2005). Philosophy through curriculum summary in the web. www. Philosophy for children (reviw of literature).
Amsruda, KE.  Lybergb, A. Severinsson, E. (2019).  Development of resilience in nursing students: A systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis. Nurse Education in Practice; 41: 1-9.
Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent Development from an Agentic Perspective. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, (pp.1-43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Bandura, A. (1997). self-Efficacy: Exercise of control. New York: w.h. freeman company.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unified theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191.
Bondy, J. M., Peguero, A. A., & Johnson, B. E. (2017). Educational self-efficacy of immigrant children: The importance of gender, race, ethnicity and fragmentation. Education and Urban Society, 49 (5), 486-517.
Burgh, G. (2018). The need for philosophy in promoting democracy: A case for philosophy in the curriculum. Journal of Philosophy in Schools 5(1):38-58.
      DOI: 10.21913/JPS.v5i1.1483
Cassidy, C., Marwick, H., Deeney, L., & McLean, G. (2018). Philosophy with children, selfregulation and engaging participation for children with emotional behavioral needs and social interactions. Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 23 (1), 81-96.
Chohan, B. I. (2018). The Impact of Academic Failure on the Self-Concept of Elementary Grade Students. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(2), 13–.
D'Olimpio, L., & Teschers, Ch. (2016). Philosophy for Children Meets the Art of Living: A Holistic Approach to an Education for Life. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 23, 2, 114-124.
Doohr, E. (2018). Citizenship: Philosophy with Children: Thinking Skills. Retrieved from www. Dialougeworks.co.uk.
Ellis-Kennedy, Joshua; Orellana, Crystal Angelica. (2023). RESILENCY AND FATHERLESS HOUSEHOLDS. Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 1706. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/1706.
Gao. H. M., Li F., Qian Y. (2020). Father involvement in mental health of children and adolescent. Chin. Mental Health J. 34, 662–666. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2020.8.005
Gillen, M. (2019), Democracy as 'Becoming' - A Lived Enquiry into Teacher Perspectives for/with Children (P4C) Practice in Irish Educate Together Schools. (Doctoral dissertation, PhD thesis submitted for examination to Plymouth University).
Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Durlak, J. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning as a public health approach to education. The future of children, 13-32.
Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E., and Verhoeven, L. (2020). The effect of children's mathematical self-concept, mathematical self-efficacy, mathematical anxiety and teachers' competencies on the development of mathematics. Teacher Education, 94, 103096.
Kizel, A. (2017). Philosophical communities of inquiry: the search for and finding of meaning as the basis for developing a sense of responsibility. Childhood & Philosophy, 13(26), 87-103.
Kramer, S. (2020, May 30). The U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households. Retrieved September 26, 2020, from:https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/12/12/u-s-children-morelikely-than-children-in-other-countries-to-live-with-just-one-parent/
LaBelle, B. (2019). Positive Outcomes of a Social-Emotional Learning Program to Promote Student Resiliency and Address Mental Health. Contemporary School Psychology, 1-7.
Lancaster-Thomas, A. (2017). How effective is Philosophy for Children in contributing to the affective engagement of pupils in the context of secondary Religious Education? Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 4(1).
Lipmann, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.
Lipman, M. (2011). Philosophy for Children: Some Assumptions and Implications. Ethics in Progress, 2(1), 3-16.
Masten A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American psychologist. 56(3):227.
McCrea, KT. Guthrie, D. Bulanda, J. J. (2016). When traumatic stressors are not past, but now: Psychosocial treatment to develop resilience with children and youth enduring concurrent, complex trauma. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma; 9 (1): 5-16.
Murris, K. (2016). The Philosophy for Children curriculum: Resisting teacher proof texts and the formation of the ideal philosopher child. Studies in philosophy and Education,35(1), 63-78
Norris, F. H., Tracy, M., & Galea, S. (2009). Looking for resilience: Understanding the longitudinal trajectories of responses to stress. Social science & medicine, 68(12), 2190- 2198.
Sattler, K. M., & Font, S. A. (2018). Resilience in young children involved with child protective services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 75, 104-114.
Siddiqui, N., Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2017). Non-cognitive impacts of philosophy for children (pp. 1-49). School of Education, Durham University.
Syed, M., Eriksson, P. L., Frisén, A., Hwang, C. P., & Lamb, M. E. (2020). Personality development from age 2 to 33: Stability and change in ego resiliency and ego control and associations with adult adaptation. Developmental Psychology. 56(4), 815–832.
      https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000895
Vannest, K. J., Ura, S. K., Lavadia, C., & Zolkoski, S. (2019). Self-report Measures of Resilience in Children and Youth. Contemporary School Psychology, 1-10.
Ungar, M., & Theron, L. (2019). Resilience and mental health: how multisystemic processes contribute to positive outcomes. The Lancet Psychiatry 7(5)
      DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30434-1
Ungar, M., Connelly, G., Liebenberg, L. (2019). et al. How Schools Enhance the Development of Young People’s Resilience. Soc Indic Res 145, 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1728-8.
Whitney, S., Prewett, S., Wang, Ze, & Haigin C. (2017). Fathers’ importance in adolescents’ academic achievement. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 8(3–4), 101–126.
Worely, P. (2016). Philosophyband children. The Philosophers, Magazin, (72), 119-120.
Yang, H. J, (2004), Factors affecting student burnout and academic achievement in multiple enrolment programs in Taiwan's technical-vocational colleges. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 283-301.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2017), Invertigatingsehf-reglation and motivation historical packground method logical developments and furure propects, Journal research american educational, 45, p166- 18.
Zolkoski, S. M., & Bullock, L. M. (2012). Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2295-2303.
Zulkifli, H. & Hashim, R. (2020). Philosophy for Children (P4C) in Improving Critical Thinking in Secondary Ethics Classroom. International Journal of Learning, Education and Educational Research, 19 (2), 29-45.