اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر انگیزش درونی پیشرفت تحصیلی بر اساس داستان‌های فلسفی و عرفانی: بررسی فرضیه مک‌کللند

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد تحقیقات آموزشی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج،ایران

2 استادیار برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه یاسوج ،یاسوج،ایران.

چکیده

عمده پژوهشها بر سنجش اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان (فبک) در ایران فارغ از نوع داستان تاکید دارند. مک­کللند، نوع داستانهای کودکان را شاخصی برای پیشرفت معرفی کرد. هدف پژوهش حاضر، آزمون فرضیه مک­کللند در خصوص تاثیر نوع داستان بر انگیزش پیشرفت تحصیلی کودکان بود. به همین منظور، دو مطالعه صورت گرفت. در مطالعه اول، اثربخشی حلقه کندوکاو بر اساس داستانهای فلسفی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت و در مطالعه دوم، اثربخشی حلقه کندوکاو بر اساس داستانهای عرفانی. روش پژوهش، شبه­آزمایشی با پیش­آزمون، پس­آزمون و گروه کنترل بود. به گروه آزمایش طی 10 جلسه 120 دقیقه­ای بسته آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان ارائه شد؛ اما گروه کنترل هیچ­گونه مداخله­ای دریافت نکرد. مقیاس انگیزش درونی پیشرفت تحصیلی که توسط ویگ­فیلد و کامبریا برای دوره ابتدایی طراحی شده بود به عنوان ابزار استفاده شد. آزمودنی­ها شامل دانش­آموزان دختر پایه ششم ابتدایی در سال تحصیلی 1402-1401 بودند. تحلیل داده­ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل کواریانس(آنکوا) انجام شد. یافته­ها نشان دادند که حلقه کندوکاو داستانهای فلسفی  ( ) به نسبت داستانهای عرفانی ( ) تاثیر معناداری بر انگیزش پیشرفت درونی تحصیلی کودکان داشت. نتیجه آنکه، فرضیه مک­کللند تایید شد و اثربخشی فلسفه برای کودکان تحت تاثیر نوع داستانی است که در حلقه کندو کاو مورد بررسی قرار می­گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effectiveness of Philosophy for Children on Academic Intrinsic Achievement Motivation Based on Philosophical and Mystical Stories: Examining McClelland's Hypothesis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Safieh Karamian 1
  • Nasser Noshadi 2
1 * M.A. in Educational Research. Yasouj University. Faculty of Humanities. Educational Sciences and Psychology Dep. Yasouj.Iran.
2 ** Assistant professor of Curriculum Development. Yasouj University. Faculty of Humanities. Educational Sciences and Psychology Dep. Yasouj. Iran.
چکیده [English]

 
Abstract
    McClelland introduced children's stories as an indicator of achievement. Most researchers emphasize the effectiveness of philosophy for children(P4C) regardless of the type of story. This study aimed to investigate McClelland's hypothesis regarding the effect of the type of story on the motivation of children's academic achievement. For this purpose, two studies were conducted. In the first study, the effectiveness of P4C was investigated based on philosophical stories, and in the second study, the effectiveness was based on mystical stories. The research method was a quasi-experiment based on comparing two pre-test and post-test groups. The intrinsic motivation scale of academic achievement by Wigfield and Cambria designed for elementary school was used as a tool. The subjects included sixth-grade girl students. Data analysis was done using the covariance analysis method (ANCOVA). The findings of both studies showed that in the community of philosophical inquiry (CPI), philosophical stories  compared to mystical stories  had a significant impact on children's academic achievement. As a result, McClelland's hypothesis was approved and the effectiveness of philosophy for children is influenced by the type of story investigated in the CPI.
Introduction
Mysticism and philosophy are considered to be ancient dualities that have been extended to the level of Western and Eastern thought. For example, Nisbet (2003) believes that Eastern thinking is more collectivist, intuitive, dependent, and holistic, and Western thinking is more individualistic, analytical, independent, and detailed, and these characteristics predict the behavior of the people of a society is considered. Researchers also emphasize cultural characteristics and their relationship with people's ideas and their perception of the world (Cromer, 1993; Lloyd, 1990; Nakamura, 1964). Corbin considers the West a symbol of sensory matter and the East a symbol of the intelligible or divine world. For example, philosophy was born in Greece, not China, and the Greeks thought of matter as consisting of discrete bodies or atoms, while the Chinese tended to see matter as continuous matter (Becker, 1986). Such a contrast is effective in the knowledge and way of looking at the human being and the world, which can be traced in the stories written for children.  McClelland (1923-1998), who focused on the issue of motivating progress, realized that children's stories and their content are one of the indicators of the progress of any country, which was the tool of Lipman's work in the circle of exploring philosophical stories. McClelland realized that there is a positive and significant relationship between the stories in different continents and the themes within them with the achievement motivation. McClelland hypothesized that there is a relationship between the type of stories of a country and the development motivation of the people of that country. Therefore, the problem of the current research stems from the confusion between mystical and philosophical stories in research related to the field of philosophy for children in Iran and considering these two types of stories as one. Therefore, the main question of the current research is: Is the effectiveness of community of philosophical inquiry (CPI) on children's inner motivation influenced by the type of story (philosophical or mystical)?
Method
The research method was quasi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test design and a control group. Before the implementation of the plan, both experimental and control groups were pre-tested. Then, the philosophy for children was implemented as an intervention in the experimental group, but the control group did not receive this intervention (philosophy for children). In the end, both groups of subjects participated in the post-test. Due to the existence of an independent and dependent variable, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare before and after the experimental procedure (Van Breukelen, 2006). The pre-test and post-test were measured by the internal motivation scale of children's academic progress (Wigfield and Cambria, 2010). Finally, the data was analyzed with the help of SPSS version 19 software by observing the parametric assumptions. In the first study, philosophical stories (by Matthew Lipman), and in the second study, mystical stories (Rumi) were used. The 40 girl students in the sixth grade of primary school in the CPI (20 people in the experimental group and 20 people in the control group) and 40 people in the learning circle of mystical stories (20 people in the experimental group and 20 people in the control group) and They were randomly replaced in two experimental and control groups.
Results
The results of the first study showed that teaching P4C had a significant effect on academic motivation. However, in the second study, teaching philosophy to children was not effective. The findings of the present research showed that the type of story has a significant effect on academic motivation. The findings showed that philosophical stories had a significant effect on academic motivation compared to mystical stories. On the other hand, what was clearly visible in the CPI of philosophical stories compared to mystical stories was that the subjects were more eager to participate; They were more curious and asked more diverse questions. Whereas, in the CPI of mystical stories, the subjects were less eager to participate, their questions were convergent, and they had less of a critical and creative relationship with mystical stories.
Discussion and Conclusion
Perhaps one of the reasons for this difference is the content of the style of philosophical stories compared to mysticism. Mystical stories are not challenging, they have a linear and simple plot, they are suggestive and inductive, they do not follow the issue critically, they are not questionable, the end of the story can be guessed easily, and the concepts are not compatible with children's understanding. However, the philosophical stories are unpredictable and divergent and invite subjects to an intellectual challenge in a horizontal inter-subjective discourse. Russell in his book "Mysticism and Logic", considers insight and intuition, which are the basis of mysticism, as the introduction to reasoning and analysis, but with the stipulation that intuitive perceptions are not indicative of the truth in any way, but maybe wrong and since the role of intuition is more persuasive than argumentative, it is more likely to be wrong. On the other hand, Iranian mystical stories are the result of the themes of mystical poets, such as Rumi's poems, which are full of mystical explanations, in which the position of mysticism is higher than philosophy, and the feet of reasoners are always hard and unyielding.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • academic achievement
  • philosophy for children
  • philosophical stories
  • mystical stories
  • McClelland's hypothesis
ارسطو (1386). سیاست. ترجمه حمید عنایت. تهران. انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
افلاطون (1386). جمهور. ترجمه فواد روحانی. تهران. انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
اقبال لاهوری، محمد. (1380). سیر فلسفه در ایران. ترجمه آریان پور.تهران. انتشارات بامداد.
امین پور، قیصر .(1385). شعرو کودکی. چاپ اول. تهران: مروارید.
حسن زاده، علی؛ قائدی، یحیی؛ بهشتی، سعید و سلحشوری، احمد. (1401). تبیین کارکرد ویژگیهای داستانهای فبک بر خلاقیت. نشریه علمی ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی. 12(3)، 142-113.
راسل، برتراند (1386). عرفان و منطق. ترجمه نجف دریابندری. تهران. انتشارات ناهید.
شاردن، ژان. (1372). سیاحتنامه ایران. ترجمه اقبال یغمایی. تهران. انتشارات امیرکبیر.
شانه، فهیمه و نزهت، بهمن. (1400). تحلیل داستانهای کودکان با درونمایة عرفانی: مطالعة موردی. فصلنامة علمی ادبیات عرفانی دانشگاه الزهر. 13(26). 83-55.
شریعتی، علی.(1396). جهان­بینی و ایدئولوژی، مجموعه آثار شماره 23. تهران. شرکت سهامی انتشار.
شریعتی، علی.(1393). سیمای محمد. مشهد. نشر سپیده باوران.
طباطبایی، سید جواد. (1382). دیباچه ای بر نظریه انحطاط ایران(جلد نخست).تهران، نشر نگاه معاصر.
غزالی، امام محمد. (1382). تهافت الفلاسفه یا تناقض­گویی فیلسوفان. ترجمه علی اصغر حلبی. تهران. انتشارات جامی.
کربن، هانری.(1392). انسان نورانی در تصوف ایرانی. ترجمه فرامرز جواهری نیا. شیراز. انتشارات گلبان.
کبیری، علی اکبر؛ قائدی، یحیی؛ دلاور، علی و نیلی، محمد رضا. (1402). اثربخشی آموزش مبتنی بر مدل به کارگیری فناوری در برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان بر تفکر انتقادی دانش آموزان بااستعداد دوره دوم ابتدایی. تفکر و کودک، 14(1)، 56-29.
کریمــی، عبــدالعظیم .(1376). تفکــر شــهودی در کودکــان و ضــرورت بازگــشت بــه زنــدگی. پژوهشنامه ادبیات کودک ونوجوان. شمارة 10 . 7-26.
محمدیان، بنت الهدی و فرقدانی، آزاده (1397). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر ارزیابی تعارض بین والدین و خودگردانی تحصیلی. تفکر و کودک، 9(1). 53–72.
مکتبی فرد، لیلا .(1394). کودک، داستان و تفکرانتقادی . تهران: کانون پـرورش فکـری کودکـان ونوجوانان.
مهدی­یار، منصوره و عظمت مدار، فاطمه (1394). بررسی تاثیر فلسفه برای کودکان بر افزایش پیشرفت دانش آموزان. نشریه فلسفه و کودک، 10 (2).57-70.
ناجی، سعید و هاشم، رسنانی.(1399). گفت­وگوهایی درباره تاریخ، مبانی نظری، و نحوه اجرای برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان و نوجوانان. ترجمه حمید رضا محمدی. تهران. نشر نی.
نادری، زهرا؛ اسکندری، آرزو؛ عباسپور اصفهانی، نفیسه و نصرتی هشی، کمال (1401). اثربخشی اجرای برنامه آموزش فلسفه به کودکان بر نگرش به خلاقیت و انگیزه پیشرفت دانش آموزان شهر اصفهان. مجله مطالعات آموزشی و آموزشگاهی. 30(1) .351-376.
هاشمی­نژاد، قاسم.(1394). رساله درتعریف، تبیین و طبقه بندی قصه های عرفانی. تهران: هرمس.
 
Bartz, D., & G. Mathews. (2001). “Enhancing Students’ Social and Psychological Development.” Here’s How 19(2): 1–5.
Becker, C. B. (1986). Reasons for the lack of argumentation and debate in the Far East. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 10(1), 75-92.
Cam. P. (1993). Thinking Stories: Teacher Resource / Activity Book (The Children's Philosophy Series). Hale & Iremonger Pty Ltd.
Coley, R. J. (2001). Differences in the Gender Gap: Comparisons Across Racial/Ethnic Groups in Education and Work. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service
Cromer, A. (1993). Uncommon Sense: The Heretical Nature of Science. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Fisher, R. (2008). Philosophical Intelligence. In M. Hand & C. Winstanley (Eds). Philosophy in schools. London. Continuum.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Kennedy, D. (1999). Philosophy for Children and the Reconstruction of Philosophy. Metaphilosophy.  30(4). 338-359.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press.
Lipman, M, Sharp, A and Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the Classroom. Philadelphia. Temple University Press.
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1990). Demystifying Mentalities. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence." American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.
McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.
McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman & Co.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
 McClelland, D. C., & Winter, D. G. (1969). Motivating Economic Achievement: Accelerating Economic Development Through Psychological Training. New York: Free Press.
Murris, K. (2016). Posthuman child: Educational Transformation through philosophy with picture books. Routledge.
Nakamura, H. (1964). Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples. Ed. Wiener, P. P.,Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently, and Why. New York: Free Press.
Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S., & Brown, A. H. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Cengage Learning.
Piaget, J. (1933). Children’s Philosophies. in A Handbook of Child Psychology. Clark University Press.
Pourtaghi, V., Azad, E., Hasanvand, M. B. & Fouladchang, M. (2022). The Effectiveness of a Philosophy for Children Program on Aspects of School Engagement. Iranian Journal of Learning & Memory, 5(17), 5-12.
Van Breukelen, G.J.) 2006(. ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Clin Epidemiol. 59 (9), 920–925.
Vansieleghem, N. (2005). Philosophy for Children as the Wind of Thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education.39)1(, 19-35.
Wigfield, A. and Cambria, J. M. (2010). Children’s achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 35, 1-30.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). 35 years of research on students' subjective task values and motivation: A look back and a look forward. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (pp. 161–198). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.002
Winter, D. G. (2000). Power, sex, and violence: A psychological reconstruction of the 20th century and an intellectual agenda for political psychology. Political Psychology, 21, 383–404.