بررسی تاثیر برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان بر نظریه ذهن و باورهای ماکیاولیستی در دوره ابتدایی

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی تربیتی، گروه علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران

3 استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تاثیر برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان بر نظریه ذهن و باورهای ماکیاولیستی در دانش آموزان دوره ابتدایی بود. روش پژوهش، نیمه تجربی و از نوع پیش­آزمون- پس­آزمون و گروه کنترل بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش را تمامی دانش آموزان پایه­ی چهارم، پنجم و ششم شهر شیراز در سال تحصیلی 98-97 تشکیل می دادند؛ که تعداد 90 آزمودنی به روش نمونه گیری خوشه­ای به عنوان نمونه انتخاب و در دو گروه 45 نفری (گروه آزمایش و  کنترل) به صورت تصادفی جایگزین شدند. جهت آموزش فلسفه به کودکان که مبتنی بر داستان خوانی بود از کتاب "داستان­هایی برای تفکر " اثر رابرت فیشر استفاده شد. در ادامه، آزمودنی­های گروه آزمایشی به مدت ده جلسه تحت آموزش برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان قرار گرفتند. به منظورگردآوری داده­ها از مقیاس نظریه ذهن(Happe, 1994:129) و مقیاس باورهای ماکیاولیستی (Christie & Geis, 1970:10 )  استفاده شد. نتایج نشان دادند که آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان موجب ارتقاء نظریه ذهن و کاهش باورهای ماکیاولیستی در آزمودنی­های گروه آزمایش در مقایسه با گروه کنترل گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Philosophy for Children Program on the Theory of Mind and Machiavellianism Beliefs

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shokofeh Mir Bagheri 1
  • Nasser Noshadi 2
  • Fariborz Nikdel 3
1 Master's degree student in Educational Psychology, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Yasuj University, Yasuj, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Yasuj University, Yasuj, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Yasuj University, Yasuj, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of teaching philosophy for children on the theory of mind and Machiavellianism beliefs in elementary school students. The research design was quasi experimental and pre-test, post-test and control group. The statistical population of the research consisted of 90 subjects were selected and randomly assigned to two groups of 45 subjects in experimental and control group. The book "Stories for Thinking" by Robert Fisher was used to teach philosophy for children that was based on storytelling method. Subsequently, experimental group subjects were trained in philosophy for children for ten sessions. The data were collected using the theory of mind Questionnaire (Happe, 1994) and the Machiavellianism Beliefs Questionnaire (Christie and Geis, 1970). The results showed that the teaching of philosophy for children promoted the theory of mind and reduced the Machiavellianism beliefs in the experimental group subjects compared to the control group.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • philosophy for children
  • theory of mind
  • Machiavellianism beliefs

مراجع

فیشر، رابرت. (1390). داستانهایی برای فکر کردن. ترجمۀ سید جلیل شاهری لنگرودی. تهران. پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
عارفی، مژگان؛ لطیفیان، مرتضی. (1390)، بررسی نقش همدلی و باورهای ماکیاولیستی در کفایت و عدم کفایت اجتماعی دانش آموزان نه تا دوازده ساله. مجله مطالعات آموزش و یادگیری، شماره 1 ، صص 60-2.
Astington, J. W. (2001). "The future of theory‐of‐mind research: Understanding motivational states, the role of language, and real‐world consequences." Child development 72, 3, pp 685-687.
Bal, P. M. and M. Veltkamp (2013). "How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation." PloS one 8, 1, pp e55341.
Carpendale, J. I. and C. Lewis (2004). "Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction." Behavioral and brain sciences 27, 1, pp 79-96.
Christie, R. and F. Geis (1970). "Scale construction." Studies in machiavellianism 34, 4, pp 10-34.
Dahlgren, S., et al. (2017). "Theory of Mind and Executive Functions in Young Bilingual Children." The Journal of genetic psychology 178, 5, pp 303-307.
Davidson, M. C. (2006). "Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching." Neuropsychologia 44, 11, pp 2037-2078.
De Rosnay, M. and C. Hughes (2006). "Conversation and theory of mind: Do children talk their way to socio‐cognitive understanding?" British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24, 1,pp 7-37.
Del Giudice, M. (2015). "Attachment in middle childhood: An evolutionary–developmental perspective." New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 148,pp15-30.
Devine, R. T. and C. Hughes (2016). "Measuring theory of mind across middle childhood: Reliability and validity of the silent films and strange stories tasks." Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 149, pp 23-40.
Djikic, M. (2013). "Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy." Scientific Study of Literature 3, 1,pp 28-47.
Dolan, M. and R. Fullam (2004). "Theory of mind and mentalizing ability in antisocial personality disorders with and without psychopathy." Psychological medicine 34, 6,pp 1093-1102.
Dunn, J. (1994). "Changing minds and changing relationships." Children’s early understanding of mind: Origins and development, pp297-310.
Eccles, J. S. (1999). "The development of children ages 6 to 14." Future of children 9, 2,pp 30-44.
Eisner, E.W.(2002). The Arts and Creation of Mind. Yale University Press.
Esperger, Z. and T. Bereczkei (2012). "Machiavellianism and spontaneous mentalization: One step ahead of others." European Journal of personality 26, 6, pp 580-587.
Fisher, R.(2005). Teaching Children to Think(2th ). London. Nelson Thornes.
Flavell, J. H. (2000). "Development of children’s knowledge about the mental world." International journal of behavioral development 24, 1, pp 15-23.
Flavell, J. H. (2004). "Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect." Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 1982, pp274-290.
Gabbard, G. O. (2005). "Mind, brain, and personality disorders." American Journal of Psychiatry 162, 4, pp648-655.
Gallant, C. and Good, D. (2019). "Examining the “reading the mind in the eyes test” as an assessment of subtle differences in affective theory of mind after concussion". The Clinical Neuropsychologist, pp.1-22.
Happé, F. G. (1994). "An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults." Journal of autism and Developmental disorders 24, 2, pp 129-154.
Harris, P. L. (1989). Children and emotion: The development of psychological understanding, Basil Blackwell.
Harwood, M. D. and M. J. Farrar (2006). "Conflicting emotions: The connection between affective perspective taking and theory of mind." British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24, 2,pp401-418.
Haven, K. (2007). Story proof: The science behind the startling power of story, Greenwood Publishing Group.
Hess, T. M. (2006). "Adaptive aspects of social cognitive functioning in adulthood: age–related goal and knowledge influences." Social Cognition 24, 3, pp279-309.
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the Novel, Oxford University Press on Demand.
Kegan, R.(1982). The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development. Harvard University Press.
Kidd, D. C. and E. Castano (2013). "Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind." Science 342, 6156, pp377-380.
Lalonde, C. E. and M. J. Chandler (1995). "False belief understanding goes to school: On the social-emotional consequences of coming early or late to a first theory of mind." Cognition & Emotion 9, 2-3, pp167-185.
Linton, D. K. and N. I. Wiener .(2001). "Personality and potential conceptions: Mating success in a modern Western male sample." Personality and individual differences 31, 5, pp675-688.
Mar, R. A., et al. (2006). "Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds." Journal of Research in Personality 40, 5,pp 694-712.
Mar, R. A. (2009). "Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes." Communications 34, 4,pp407-428.
McHoskey, J. W. (1998). "Machiavellianism and psychopathy." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 1, pp192.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions, Cambridge University Press.
Oatley, K. (2012). The passionate muse: Exploring emotion in stories, Oxford University Press.
Paal, T. and T. Bereczkei (2007). "Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations." Personality and individual differences 43, 3, pp541-551.
Panero, M. E. (2016). "Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 111, 5,pp e46.
Premack, D. and G. Woodruff (1978). "Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?" Behavioral and brain sciences 1, 4, pp 515-526.
Ritter, K.. (2011). "Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder." Psychiatry research 187, 1-2, pp241-247.
Ruffman, T. (1999). "How parenting style affects false belief understanding." Social Development 8, 3, pp 395-411.
Slaughter, V. (2002). "Theory of mind and peer acceptance in preschool children." British Journal of Developmental Psychology 20, 4, pp 545-564.
Slaughter, V. and B. Repacholi (2004). Introduction Individual Differences in Theory of Mind: What Are We Investigating? Individual differences in theory of mind, Psychology Press,pp 11-23.
Sutton, J. and E. Keogh (2001). "Components of Machiavellian beliefs in children: Relationships with personality." Personality and individual differences 30, 1, pp 137-148.
Sutton, J. (1999). "Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’view of anti‐social behaviour." Social Development 8, 1, pp 117-127.
Wellman, H. (1990). "The child's theory of mindMIT Press." Cambridge, MA.
Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops, Oxford University Press.
Wilson, D. S. (1996). "Machiavellianism: a synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures." Psychological bulletin 119, 2,pp 285.
Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 285–299.
Wimmer, H. and J. Perner (1983). "Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception." Cognition 13, 1, pp103-128.
Zunshine, L. (2006). "Why we read fiction." Skeptical Inquirer 30, 6, pp 29.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار