تبیین هویت اخلاقی و رفتار مطلوب اجتماعی، مبتنی بر مؤلفه‌های پیشایندی سبک‌های دلبستگی والدین-نوجوان، دلبستگی به مدرسه و خود‌تنظیمی (کنترل تلاشگر)

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه آموزش روان‌شناسی و مشاوره، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889-14665 تهران، ایران

2 استاد، گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

4 استادیار، گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مطالعه در‌باره هویت و رفتار اخلاقی از منابع متعددی سرچشمه می‌گیرد که یکی از این منابع وقوع شکست و فروپاشی اخلاقی و بروز رفتارهای ضد اجتماعی در نسل نوجوان و جوان جوامع است. مطالعة حاضر با هدف تبیین هویت اخلاقی و رفتار مطلوب اجتماعی مبتنی بر متغیرهای پیشایندی سبک دلبستگی والدین-‌نوجوان، دلبستگی به مدرسه و خودتنظیمی (کنترل تلاشگر) در نوجوانان انجام شد. روش پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف بنیادی و از نظر ماهیت داده‌ها همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش، شامل کلیه دانش‌آموزان مقطع متوسطه دوم در سال تحصیلی 99-1398 شهر اهواز بود که 448 نفر از آن‌ها به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چند مرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند.شرکت‌کنندگان به پرسش‌‌نامه هویت اخلاقی، مقیاس‌های رابطه، دلبستگی به مدرسه، مقیاس کنترل تلاشگر و سنجه گرایشات مطلوب اجتماعی پاسخ دادند. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده نشان داد که همه ضرایب اثرات مستقیم به‌ جز ضرایب مسیر سبک دلبستگی پریشان و هراسناک به هویت اخلاقی معنی‌دار بودند. هم‌چنین ضرایب اثرات غیرمستقیم همه مسیرها به غیر از دلبستگی پریشان به هویت اخلاقی از طریق کنترل تلاشگر معنی‌دار بود. بنابراین سازه خودتنظیمی به‌عنوان عاملی برگرفته از شیوه‌های فرزندپروری با رشد احساس کنترل بر هیجانات، رشد خودآگاهی و درک بهتر روابط اجتماعی به ارتقاء هویت اخلاقی و رفتارمطلوب اجتماعی منجر خواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explanation of Moral Identity and Prosocial Behavior Based on Antecedent Components of Parent- Adolescent Attachment Styles, School Attachment and Self -Regulation (Effortful Control)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Esmat Motaharnejad 1
  • Parvin Kadivar 2
  • Hadi Keramati 3
  • Mehdi Arabzade 4
1 Lecturer, Department of Psychology and Counselling, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The study of identity and moral behavior originates from many sources, one of which is the occurrence of moral failure and collapse and emergence of anti-social behaviors in adolescent and young generation of societies.The purpose of this study was explanation of moral identity and prosocial behavior in adolescents based on the antecedent variables of parent-adolescent attachment style, school attachment and self-regulation (effortful control). Research method in terms of purpose was basic, and correlational in terms of nature of data. The statistical population of research included all students of the second secondary level in academic year of 2018-2019 in city of Ahvaz, of which 448 were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling. The participants responded to Questionnaires of Moral Identity, Relationship Scale, School Attachment, Effortful Control Scale, Prosocial Tendencies Measure. The obtained results showed that all coefficients of direct effects except the path coefficients of preoccupied and fearful attachment style to moral identity were significant. Also, the coefficients of indirect effects of all paths were significant except for preoccupied attachment to moral identity through effortful control. Therefore, the structure of self-regulation as a factor derived from parenting methods will lead to the development of a sense of control over emotions, the development of self-awareness and a better understanding of social relations, to the improvement of moral identity and prosocial behavior.
 
Keywords: effortful control, moral identity, prosocial behavior, parent-adolescent attachment, school attachment, self-regulation
 
 
 
 
Explanation of Moral Identity and Prosocial Behavior Based on Antecedent Components of Parent- Adolescent Attachment Styles, School Attachment and Self -Regulation (Effortful Control)
 
Extended abstract
Introduction: Adolescence is the period of identity formation and adolescents strive to create a stable sense of identity based on the main aspects of their lives. They develop a sense of their moral, occupational, religious, political and sexual identity. The integration of identity and morality begins in early adolescence and continues throughout adulthood. Identity refers to various experiences and psychological processes that are related to the self. For those who are oriented towards moral issues, the moral dimension forms the central core of their identity, and thus moral identity is formed. The importance of studying moral identity and behavior comes from several sources, one of which is the occurrence of moral failure and collapse and the emergence of anti-social behaviors in the adolescent and young generation of societies, and it seems that moral identity can be effective in providing an explanation of these failures. On the other hand, adolescents engage in prosocial activities by joining groups and participating in activities. The result of this partnership is the emergence of prosocial behaviors, which this structure represents moral action in the form of voluntary social services. The present study aimed to explain moral identity and prosocial behavior based on the antecedent variables of parent-adolescent attachment style, school attachment and self-regulation (effortful control) in adolescents.
Research method and tools: The present research method in terms of purpose was basic, and correlational (structural equation modeling) in terms of the nature of data. Pearson's correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used to test the hypotheses related to the relationships between variables. The statistical population of research included all secondary school students in the academic year of 2018-2019 in Ahvaz city, of which 448 were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling.To collect the required data, the subjects responded the Moral Identity Questionnaire (this questionnaire has 10 items and two internal and symbolic subscales), the Relationship Scales Questionnaire for measuring attachment style (with 30 items and four subscales of secure attachment style and preoccupied attachment style , fearful attachment style and dismissing attachment style), School Attachment Questionnaire (with 20 items and three subscales of general relationship, belongingness and specific attachments), Effortful Control Scale (with 20 items and three subscales of control, attentional control, activation control and inhibitory control) and Prosocial Tendencies Measure (including 23 items and six subscales of prosocial behavior, public, anonymous, dire, emotional, compliant and altruistic).
Results: In structural equation modeling to determine path coefficients before data analysis , the assumptions of this method were examined and the results showed that all the assumptions were met. Also, based on the obtained indicators the research model had an acceptable and good fitness with data and was confirmed. Also, the results of structural equation modeling analysis showed that the coefficients of direct path of school attachment to prosocial behavior and moral identity are positive and significant. Also, the coefficients of direct path of secure attachment style to prosocial behavior and moral identity are positive and significant. But, the coefficients of direct path of preoccupied attachment style to prosocial behavior and effortful control are negative and significant. The coefficients of indirect path of secure attachment style and school attachment to moral identity through effortful control are positive and significant. Also, the coefficients of indirect path of fearful and dismissing attachment style to moral identity through effortful control are positive and significant. While, the coefficient of indirect path of preoccupied attachment style to prosocial behavior through moral identity was negative and significant. The coefficient of indirect path of effortful control to prosocial behavior through moral identity is also positive and significant.
Discussion: Identity formation begins during adolescence, and it is necessary for the family, along with other social institutions, including school and other educational environments, to help the adolescent to develop an integrated identity. For this purpose, common moral values and norms between the three important institutions of family, school and society must be defined. In this way, the developed moral identity is a mixture of moral judgment, self-perceptions, and action that forms the foundation of personality and social opportunities. On the other hand, due to the relationship between the formation of moral identity and acting on prosocial behaviors, and in order to encourage children and teenagers to act on their moral beliefs, the cooperation and synergy of family and social factors is necessary. People with developed moral identity are more likely to participate in prosocial behaviors due to the acceptance of moral values and socialization patterns of parents and teachers, and in this regard, parents and teachers as role models can teach moral and social values through the use of attachment styles to children and adolescents. Secure attachment helps to integrate values into moral identity and leads to moral maturity. Effortful control as a factor affected by parenting practices and in the role of a self-regulation system has a supervisory role on adolescents' cognitions and emotions, and adolescents with high scores in effortful control and with a secure attachment style use more consistent forms of emotional regulation and are more social.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • effortful control
  • moral identity
  • prosocial behavior
  • parent-adolescent attachment
  • school attachment
  • self-regulation
پژوهنده، علی، فرزاد، ولی‌اله، کدیور، پروین (1390). بررسی شاخص‌های روان‌سنجی پرسش‌نامه دلبستگی به مدرسه، پژوهشنامه تربیتی، 6‌(27)، 34-9.
ترکاشوند، معصومه، کرامتی، هادی (1400). پیش‌بینی انواع قلدری بر اساس زیر مقیاس­های گسست اخلاقی و هویت اخلاقی در دانش آموزان مقطع ابتدایی شهر تهران. تفکر و کودک، 12(2)، 110-95.
حبیبی، مجتبی، مرادی، خدیجه، پورآوری، مینو، صالحی، سمیه (1394)، بررسی میزان شیوع اختلالات رفتاری در دانش‌آموزان مقطع راهنمایی و متوسطه استان قم،  تخصصی اپیدمیولوژی ایران، 11(1)، 63-56.
شجاعی، راحله (1397). بررسی رابطه هویت اخلاقی با رفتارهای ضد‌اجتماعی نوجوانان با نقش تعدیل‌گر خودتنظیمی شناختی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد شاهرود، شاهرود.
محمدی نصرآباد، محدثه، علوی لنگرودی، سیدکاظم، زندوانیان، احمد، استبرقی، مهدیه (1398). اﺛﺮﺑﺨﺸﻲ آﻣﻮزش ارزشﻫﺎی اخلاقی (از طریق قصه گویی و پویا نمایی) در رشد مهارتهای اجتماعی کودکان پیش دبستانی. تفکر و کودک، 10(2)، 247-227
هومن، حیدرعلی (1396)، الگو‌یابی معادلات ساختاری با کاربرد نرم‌افزار لیزرل (با اصلاحات)، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(6), 1423-1440.‏
Atherton, O. E., Zheng, L. R., Bleidorn, W., & Robins, R. W. (2019). The codevelopment of effortful control and school behavioral problems. Journal of personality and social psychology117(3), 659-673.‏
Berkowitz, M. (2012). Moral and character education. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 247–264). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bock, T., & Samuelson, P. L. (2014). Educating for moral identity: An analysis of three moral identity constructs with implications for moral education. Journal of Character Education10(2), 155.‏
Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The journal of early adolescence23(1), 107-134.
Damon, W., & Gregory, A. (1997). The youth charter: Towards the formation of adolescent moral identity. Journal of Moral Education, 26(2), 117-130.‏
Ding, W., Shao, Y., Sun, B., Xie, R., Li, W., & Wang, X. (2018). How can prosocial behavior be motivated? The different roles of moral judgment, moral elevation, and moral identity among the young Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology9, 814.‏
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence15(3), 235-260.‏
Ellis, L. K., & Rothbart, M. K. (2001). Revision of the early adolescent temperament questionnaire. In Poster presented at the 2001 biennial meeting of the society for research in child development, Minneapolis, Minnesota.‏
Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 868-888.‏
Fatima, S., Dawood, S., & Munir, M. (2020). Parenting styles, moral identity and prosocial behaviors in adolescents. Current Psychology, 1-9.‏
Feeney, J., Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. (2016). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York, NY, USA.: The Guilford Press.
Frazier, K., West-Olatunji, C., St. Juste, S., & Goodman, R. (2009). Transgenerational trauma and child sexual abuse: Reconceptualizing cases involving young survivors of CSA. Journal of Mental Health Counseling31(1), 22-33.‏
Fu, W., Wang, C., Chai, H., & Xue, R. (2022). Examining the relationship of empathy, social support, and prosocial behavior of adolescents in China: A structural equation modeling approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications9(1), 1-8.‏
Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67(3), 430-445.‏
Gross, J. T., Stern, J. A., Brett, B. E., & Cassidy, J. (2017). The multifaceted nature of prosocial behavior in children: Links with attachment theory and research. Social Development26(4), 661-678.‏
Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2011). Moral identity. In S. J. Schwartz,. K.Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.),  Handbook of identity theory and research; (pp. 495-513). New York, NY: Springer.
Hardy, S. A., & Kisling, J. W. (2006). Identity statuses and prosocial behaviors in young adulthood: A brief report. Identity6(4), 363-369.‏
Hardy, S. A., Bean, D. S., & Olsen, J. A. (2015). Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors: Interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence44, 1542-1554.‏
Hart, D. (2005). The development of moral identity. In G. Carlo & C. P. Edwards (Eds.), Moral motivation through the life span (pp. 165-196). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(3), 511.
Hertz, S. G., & Krettenauer, T. (2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior?: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology20(2), 129-140.‏
Hirschfield, P. J., & Gasper, J. (2011). The relationship between school engagement and delinquency in late childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence40, 3-22.‏
Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder Jr, G. H. (2001). Students' attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 318-340.‏
Kroger J. (2017). Identity development in adolescence and adulthood. Oxford: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
Lapsley, D. K., & Stey, P. (2014). Moral self-identity as the aim of education. Handbook of Moral and Character Education46, 30-52.‏
Matsuba, M. K., Murzyn, T., & Hart, D. (2011). A model of moral identity: Applications for education. Advances in Child Development and Behavior40, 181-207.‏
Matsuba, M. K., Murzyn, T., & Hart, D. (2014). Moral identity development and community. Handbook of moral development, 2, 520-537.
Mestre, M. V., Carlo, G., Samper, P., Tur-Porcar, A. M., & Mestre, A. L. (2015). Psychometric evidence of a multidimensional measure of prosocial behaviors for Spanish adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology176(4), 260-271.‏
Moshman, D. (2011). Adolescent rationality and development: Cognition, morality, and identity. Psychology Press.‏
Nucci L. (2015). Moral development and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sengsavang, S., & Krettenauer, T. (2015). Children's moral self-concept: The role of aggression and parent–child relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61(2), 213-235.
Shi, H., Zhao, H., Ren, Z., Li, X., He, M., Zha, S., ... & Zhang, X. (2022). Associations of parent-adolescent relationship and self-esteem with emotional and behavioral problems among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders311, 126-133.‏
Varela, J. J., Zimmerman, M. A., Ryan, A. M., Stoddard, S. A., & Heinze, J. E. (2021). School attachment and violent attitudes preventing future violent behavior among youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence36(9-10), 5407-5426.‏
Varma, M. M., Chen, D., Lin, X., Aknin, L. B., & Hu, X. (2022). Prosocial behavior promotes positive emotion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emotion.‏
Walsh, J. J., Christoffel, D. J., & Malenka, R. C. (2022). Neural circuits regulating prosocial behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology, 1-11.‏
Zacarés, J. J., & Iborra, A. (2015). Self and identity development during adolescence across cultures. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd Ed) (pp. 432-438). Oxford: Elsevier.
Zhou, Q., Chen, S. H., & Main, A. (2012). Commonalities and differences in the research on children’s effortful control and executive function: A call for an integrated model of self‐regulation. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 112-121