فرا تحلیل اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه به کودکان بر مهارت‌های شناختی دانش آموزان

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت، مرودشت، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکترای روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی، تبریز، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکترای روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی، تبریز،ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، فرا تحلیل اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه بر مهارت‌های شناختی دانش آموزان ایرانی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش‌های در دسترس مرتبط با اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه به کودکان بر مهارت‌های شناختی بود که در بین سال‌های 1380 تا 1400 در بانک‌های اطلاعاتی رایانه‌ای قابل‌دسترس در پایگاه اطلاعات علمی: پرتال جامع علوم انسانی و پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)، بانک اطلاعات نشریات کشور (مگیران)، ، جهاد دانشگاهی (SID)، پایگاه مجلات تخصصی نور (نورمگز) بود. درنهایت 72 پژوهش با 89 اندازه اثر وارد فرا تحلیل شدند. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد میزان اندازه اثر ترکیبی کل (99/0) که باتوجه‌به معیار هاتیه مطلوب و بر اساس معیار کوهن بزرگ ارزیابی می‌شود. همچنین در بررسی نقش متغیرهای تعدیل‌کننده، نتایج اثربخشی مطلوب بر هرکدام از مهارت‌های شناختی: تفکر انتقادی، انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی، قضاوت، حل مسئله و پرسشگری بررسی شد که از آن میان اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه بر انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی با اندازه اثر خلاصه (07/1) بیشترین مقدار را دارا بود. با توجه به اثربخشی بالای آموزش فلسفه بر مهارت‌های شناختی در گروه‌های جنسیتی، پیشنهاد می‌شود که این برنامه با پیروی از اصول خود به برنامه رسمی آموزش‌وپرورش در مدارس افزوده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching philosophy to children on students' cognitive skills

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leila Mirzaei 1
  • Zahra Golizade 2
  • Zahra Samadi 3
1 Master of Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch Marvdasht, Iran,
2 Ph.D. candidate of Educational Psychology, University of Shahid Madani, Tabriz,Iran (
3 Ph.D. candidate of Educational Psychology, University of Shahid Madani, Tabriz, Iran,
چکیده [English]

The purpose of the current research was to Meta-analyze the effectiveness of philosophy education on the cognitive skills of Iranian students. The statistical population was the available research related to cognitive and metacognitive interventions on anxiety, available between 2001 and 2021 in the computer databases accessible. Finally, 72 studies with 89 effect sizes were included in the meta-analysis. The research findings showed that the size of the total combined effect (0.99) is evaluated according to Hattie's criterion and based on Cohen's large criterion. Also, in examining the role of moderating variables, the results of favorable effectiveness on each of the cognitive skills: critical thinking, cognitive flexibility, judgment, problem-solving, and questioning were investigated, among which the effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive flexibility with a summary effect size (1.07) was the highest. Had the amount considering the high effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive skills in gender groups, it is suggested that this program be added to the official education program in schools by following its principles.
Keywords: Effect Size, Cognitive flexibility, Cognitive Skill, Meta-Analysis, Philosophy for Children.
Introduction
The cognitive skills of children are influenced by teaching philosophy. The program of teaching philosophical thinking to children has clear cognitive goals; it engages the mind and does so through challenges, critical thinking, and structural interaction. (Haynes, 2012). Teaching philosophy to children leads to an increase in cognitive skills related to verbal comprehension, spatial relationships, sound combination, concept formation, and visual-auditory memory, which are within the realm of cognitive functions. Preschool children who receive philosophy education have higher cognitive abilities. (Hassan Beigi, 2021) Numerous studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of teaching philosophy to children on the growth of cognitive skills. Each study has examined the impact of teaching philosophy to children on one of the cognitive growth components, such as critical thinking, moral development, problem-solving, creative thinking, questioning spirit, responsibility, etc. Some of the studies in this field include Kabiri et al. (2022) and Soleimanpouromran et al. (2021). Therefore, the breadth and distribution of research conducted in this area highlight the need for a systematic review of previous research. Accordingly, the present meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect size of the combined effectiveness of implementing the philosophy education program on the growth of various cognitive skills.
Materials & methods
In this study, a meta-analysis method was used based on the purpose and nature of the research. In meta-analysis, the findings of primary studies are translated into a quantitative index. The most common method for combining the numerical results of studies in meta-analyses is effect size. The statistical population included all articles published in scientific research journals, master's theses, and valid doctoral dissertations in computerized databases available in the country between 2001 and 2021, which examined the effectiveness of philosophy education on students' cognitive skills using experimental and quasi-experimental methods. Finally, 122 studies were identified, and based on the exit criteria, 50 studies were excluded, and a total of 72 studies with 89 effect sizes were suitable for entry into the meta-analysis based on the scientific and Methodological conditions of the dependent variable dimensions. In the process of searching for primary studies, keywords such as "philosophy education," "philosophy education using the community of inquiry method," "philosophy education for children," and "p4c" were used in computerized databases available in Iran, such as the Scientific Information Database (SID), the National Journal Database, the Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, and the Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), as well as foreign information databases such as Google Scholar, Science Direct, and PubMed. In this study, the research design specifications checklist developed by Mesr Abadi (2009) was used to collect information. To analyze the data extracted from primary studies, the effect size of the type g was calculated for each study. CMA version 2 and SPSS version 22 were used for calculating effect sizes and subsequent statistical activities related to combining the results.
Result
Table 1 presents the combined effect size (summary) based on two fixed and random models for 77 primary effect sizes. According to the results, the combined effect size values in the fixed model are 0.95, and in the random model, it is 0.99, and both effect sizes are statistically significant. ) p < 0.001).




Table 1. Combined fixed and random effect sizes related to the effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive skills




Model


Number of effect sizes


Summary  effect size


 
 


95% confidence interval


Z-value


significance level




lower limit


upper limit




fixed


79


0.95


 


0.03


1.02


26/89


0.001




random


79


0.99


 


0.05


1.09


19.26


0.001




 
In Table 2, the effect sizes of the combined effect of teaching philosophy on each of the cognitive skills presented have been provided. The effect sizes of the combined effect of each of the cognitive skills are as follows: 0.97, 0.71, 0.98, 0.81, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively, all of which are significant (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the intragroup Q index is equal to 62.118, of which the intergroup Q index is equal to 37.34 (p < 0.05 and df = 5). The results of this table show that the heterogeneity value between the five groups of primary studies based on cognitive skills is 37.34, and the effect sizes related to the effectiveness of teaching philosophy on cognitive skills can be different and heterogeneous. It should be noted that studies with less than four samples were excluded from this section.




Table 2- Combined effect sizes of the effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive skills




Cognitive skills


Number of effect sizes


Composite effect size


The standard error


95% confidence interval


Z-value


significance level




Lower limit


Upper limit




Critical Thinking


24


0.97


0.06


0.85


1.09


15.52


0.001




Cognitive flexibility


13


1.07


0.09


0.85


1.25


11.80


0.001




judgment


10


0.98


0.11


0.77


1.22


8.95


0.001




Problem-Solving


8


0.81


0.09


0.62


1.01


8.28


0.001




questioning


4


0.95


0.16


0.84


1.27


5.92


0.001




reasoning


4


0.94


0.16


0.62


1.27


5.67


0.001




 
Discussion
To explain the overall effectiveness of teaching philosophy on the growth of cognitive skills, it can be said that philosophy for children is an educational approach that includes various goals, and practicing and implementing it can lead to the growth of cognitive skills. Lipman, as the founder of Philosophy for Children, considers the most important goal of this program to be the cultivation of individuals' reasoning power so that they can think independently and use criteria of correctness in their judgments. In this program, students are encouraged to actively engage with information rather than just accepting it, to analyze and examine the information and knowledge at hand, and to use this skill to equip students with the ability to make sound judgments and choices, as well as critical thinking skills, ultimately preparing them for a suitable role in society. It is expected that by considering the educational and training reasons for this program and focusing on the cultivation of critical and philosophical thinking, teaching philosophy to students in a comprehensive and national program in schools across the country, apart from the official school curriculum, can help improve the education system.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Effect Size
  • Cognitive flexibility
  • Cognitive Skill
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Philosophy for Children
اعتصامی، حمیده، و شفیع آبادی، عبدالله. (1401). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر رشد اخلاقی دانش آموزان پسر پایه ششم دبستان. فرهنگ مشاوره و روان درمانی، 13(52), 233-255.
جعفری، زهره.، صمدی، پروین. و قائدی، یحیی. (1394). تأثیر آموزش فلسفه به کودکان بر پرورش روحیه پژوهشگری کودکان دوره پیش‌دبستانی، دانش و پژوهش در علوم تربیتی-برنامهریزی درسی، دوره 12، شماره 17، 49-41.
حسن بیگی، مریم. (1400). اثر آموزش فلسفه به کودکان بر کارکردهای شناختی در کودکان پیش‌دبستانی. فصلنامه مطالعات روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی. دوره 7، شماره 1، 97-82.
حمیدی، فریده.، دماوندی، مجید ابراهیم. و رستمی، یاسین. (1392). بررسی تفاوت‌های جنسیتی در مهارت‌های زبانی دانش آموزان پایه اول ابتدایی. زن در فرهنگ و هنر (پژوهش رنان), 5(2), 227-238.
رضایی، نور محمد.، پادروند، نادر.، سبحانی، عبدالرضا. و رضایی، علی‌محمد. (1393). بررسی تأثیر اجرای برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان در افزایش خالقت و مؤلفه‌های سیالی، انعطاف‌پذیری، ابتکار و بسط. فصلنامه ابتکار و خالقت در علوم انسانی، 4(2)،36-19.
سلیمان پور عمران، محبوبه. و یساولی، ناهید. (1400). تأثیر برنامه‌ی درسی (P4C) فلسفه برای کودکان بر عشق به یادگیری و قضاوت اخلاقی کودکان. تفکر و کودک، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. سال دوازدهم، شماره اول، بهار و تابستان 1400،59 – 73.
سیفی گندمانی، محمد یاسین.، شقایقی، فرهاد. و کلانتری میبدی، سارا (1390). اثربخشی برنامه آموزش فلسفه به دانش‌آموزان دختر بر عزت‌نفس و توانایی حل مسئله آن‌ها، فصلنامه روانشناسی کاربرد،5(2)،66-83.
شاه محمدی, نیره. (1399). بررسی اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه به کودکان بر تفکرانتقادی دانش آموزان پایه ششم. تفکر وکودک, 11(1), 95-116. doi: 10.30465/fabak.2020.5831
فتحی، لیلا.، احقر، قدسی. و نادری، عزت اله. (1397). تأثیر آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان (P4C) روش پژوهش مشارکتی بر مسئولیت‌پذیری دانش آموزان. فصلنامه خانواده و پژوهش،15(1)،7-18.
فیشر، رابرت .(1386). آموزش تفکر به کودکان. ترجمه صفایی مقدم، مسعود و نجاریان، افسانه. چاپ دوم. اهواز: نشر رسش.
 فیشر، رابرت .(1388). آموزش و تفکر. ترجمه کیان زاده، فروغ. چاپ دوم. اهواز: نشر رسش.
کبیری، علی‌اکبر.، قاسمی، علی. و مذبوحی، سعید. (1400). اثربخشی اجرای برنامهٔ فلسفه برای کودکان بر ادراک شایستگی و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی کودکان پسر بی‌سرپرست. تفکر و کودک، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. سال 12، شماره 2، پاییز و زمستان 1400،241 – 2.
مرعشی، سید منصور. (1388). پویایی‌های اجتماع پژوهشی در برنامه‌ی آموزش فلسفه به کودکان، فصل‌نامه فرهنگ، شماره ،69 109 -150.
 
 
Bowman, N. A. (2010). College diversity experiences and cognitive development: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 4–33.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge Academic.
Daniel, M. & Auriac, E. (2011). Philosophy critical thinking and Philosophy for children. Journal of Educating Philosophically, 43, 415-435.
Dawn, J., Flengan, K., Samuel, F. & Vincent, G .(2016). The Achievement Test Desk Reference: A Guide to Learning Disability Identification, Second Edition.
Ellemberg, D., St-Louis-Deschênes, M.(2010). The effect of acute physical exercise on cognitive function during development. Psychol. Sports Exerc, 11, 122–126.
Evans, J.J. (2003). Basic concepts and principles of neuropsychological assessment. In Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology; Halligan, P.W., Kischka, U., Marshall, J.C., Eds.; University Press: Oxford, UK,; pp. 15–26. 25.
Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2017). Can ‘Philosophy for Children improve primary school attainment? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 5-22.
Haynes, J. (2008). Children as philosophers: Learning through Enquiry and Dialogue in the Primary Classroom London: Routledge Falmer, pages 176.
Haynes, J. (2012). Children as philosophers. London: Routledge Falmer.
Kohan, W. O. (2018). Paulo Freire and Philosophy for Children: A critical dialogue. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37(6), 615-629.
Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (2010). Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press.
Lyle, S. (2021). Philosophy for Children, the UNCRC and Children's Voice in the Context of the Climate
Mcbrayer, K. (2012). Bridging ridging policy-practice gap: protecting right of youth with learning dishabille in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1909-1914.
Padgett, R. D., Johnson, M. P., & Pascarella, E. T. (2012). First-generation undergraduate students and the impacts of the first year of college: Additional evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 53, 243–266.
Petersen, R. C. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J. Intern. Med. 256, 183–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x.
Roth, Robert & Isquith, Peter & Gioia, Gerard. (2014). Assessment of Executive Functioning Using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). 10.1007/978 - 1 - 4614 -8106 -5_18.
Sabanathan, S., Wills, B., Gladstone, M.(2015).Child development assessment tools in low-income and middle-income countries: how can we use them more appropriately? Archives of Disease in Childhood ,100:482-488.
Smith, A.D. and Kelly, A. (2015). Cognitive Processes. In The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging.  DOI: 10.1002/9781118521373.
Topping, K.J., and Trickey, S. (2014). The role of dialog in philosophy for children, International Journal of Educational Research, 63,69-78.
Williams, S. (2012). A Brief History of P4C and SAPERE. In Lewis, L, and Chandley, N. (Eds), Philosophy for Children through the Secondary Curriculum. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Worley, P. (2016). Philosophy and children. The Philosophers' Magazine, 72, 119-120.
Yan, S., Walters, L. M., Wang, Z., Wang Ch.Ch.(2018).Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Philosophy for Children Programs on Students’ Cognitive Outcomes, Analytic Teaching, and Philosophical Praxis,39(1).33-13.